No author, however, can ever escape from the influences of his time, and, just as much as his lesser contemporaries, Milton has his place in literary history and derives from the great original impulse which set in motion all the enterprises of the century.  He is the last and greatest figure in the English Renaissance.  The new passion for art and letters which in its earnest fumbling beginnings gave us the prose of Cheke and Ascham and the poetry of Surrey and Sackville, comes to a full and splendid and perfect end in his work.  In it the Renaissance and the Reformation, imperfectly fused by Sidney and Spenser, blend in their just proportions.  The transplantation into English of classical forms which had been the aim of Sidney and the endeavour of Jonson he finally accomplished; in his work the dream of all the poets of the Renaissance—­the heroic poem—­finds its fulfilment.  There was no poet of the time but wanted to do for his country what Vergil had planned to do for Rome, to sing its origins, and to celebrate its morality and its citizenship in the epic form.  Spenser had tried it in The Fairy Queen and failed splendidly.  Where he failed, Milton succeeded, though his poem is not on the origins of England but on the ultimate subject of the origins of mankind.  We know from his notebooks that he turned over in his mind a national subject and that the Arthurian legend for a while appealed to him.  But to Milton’s earnest temper nothing that was not true was a fit subject for poetry.  It was inevitable he should lay it aside.  The Arthurian story he knew to be a myth and a myth was a lie; the story of the Fall, on the other hand, he accepted in common with his time for literal fact.  It is to be noted as characteristic of his confident and assured egotism that he accepted no less sincerely and literally the imaginative structure which he himself reared on it.  However that may be, the solid fact about him is that in this “adventurous song” with its pursuit of

“Things unattempted yet in prose or rhyme,”

he succeeded in his attempt, that alone among the moderns he contrived to write an epic which stands on the same eminence as the ancient writings of the kind, and that he found time in a life, which hardly extended to old age as we know it, to write, besides noble lyrics and a series of fiercely argumentative prose treatises, two other masterpieces in the grand style, a tragedy modelled on the Greeks and a second epic on the “compact” style of the book of Job.  No English poet can compare with him in majesty or completeness.

An adequate study of his achievement is impossible within the limits of the few pages that are all a book like this can spare to a single author.  Readers who desire it will find it in the work of his two best critics, Mark Pattison and Sir Walter Raleigh.[4] All that can be done here is to call attention to some of his most striking qualities.  Foremost, of course, is the temper of the man.  From the