In a way the Bible, like the preachers, lies outside the domain of literary study in the narrow sense; but its sheer literary magnitude, the abiding significance of it in our subsequent history, social, political, and artistic as well as religious, compel us to turn aside to examine the causes that have produced such great results.  The Authorized Version is not, of course, a purely seventeenth century work.  Though the scholars[3] who wrote and compiled it had before them all the previous vernacular texts and chose the best readings where they found them or devised new ones in accordance with the original, the basis is undoubtedly the Tudor version of Tindall.  It has, none the less, the qualities of the time of its publication.  It could hardly have been done earlier; had it been so, it would not have been done half so well.  In it English has lost both its roughness and its affectation and retained its strength; the Bible is the supreme example of early English prose style.  The reason is not far to seek.  Of all recipes for good or noble writing that which enjoins the writer to be careful about the matter and never mind the manner, is the most sure.  The translators had the handling of matter of the gravest dignity and momentousness, and their sense of reverence kept them right in their treatment of it.  They cared passionately for the truth; they were virtually anonymous and not ambitious of originality or literary fame; they had no desire to stand between the book and its readers.  It followed that they cultivated that naked plainness and spareness which makes their work supreme.  The Authorized Version is the last and greatest of those English translations which were the fruit of Renaissance scholarship and pioneering.  It is the first and greatest piece of English prose.

[Footnote 3:  There is a graphic little pen-picture of their method in Selden’s “Table Talk.”]

Its influence is one of those things on which it is profitless to comment or enlarge simply because they are an understood part of every man’s experience.  In its own time it helped to weld England, for where before one Bible was read at home and another in churches, all now read the new version.  Its supremacy was instantaneous and unchallenged, and it quickly coloured speech and literature; it could produce a Bunyan in the century of its birth.  To it belongs the native dignity and eloquence of peasant speech.  It runs like a golden thread through all our writing subsequent to its coming; men so diverse as Huxley and Carlyle have paid their tribute to its power; Ruskin counted it the one essential part of its education.  It will be a bad day for the mere quality of our language when it ceases to be read.