as he watched the battle. It was the saying of
a shrewd observer, but it expresses only an imperfect
apprehension of the truth. Vindictiveness is
not the spirit our men should have, but a resoluteness
of determination, as much more to be relied upon than
a vindictive passion as it is founded upon more stable
and more enduring qualities of character. The
worst characters of our great cities may be the fit
equals of Mississippi or Arkansas ruffians, but the
mass of our army is not to be brought down to the
standard of rowdies or the level of barbarians.
The men of New England and of the West do not march
under banners with the device of “Booty and
Beauty,” though General Beauregard has the effrontery
to declare it, and Bishop, now General, Polk the ignorance
to utter similar slanders. The atrocities committed
on our wounded and prisoners by the “chivalry”
of the South may excite not only horror, but a wild
fury of revenge. But our cause should not be stained
with cruelty and crime, even in the name of vengeance.
If the war is simply one in which brute force is to
prevail, if we are fighting only for lust and pride
and domination, then let us have our “Ellsworth
Avengers,” and let us slay the wounded of our
enemy without mercy; let us burn their hospitals,
let us justify their, as yet, false charges against
us; let us admit the truth of the words of the Bishop
of Louisiana, that the North is prosecuting this war
“with circumstances of barbarity which it was
fondly believed would never more disgrace the annals
of a civilized people.” But if we, if our
brothers in the army, are to lose the proud distinctions
of the North, and to be brought down to the level of
the tender mercies and the humane counsels of slaveholders
and slave-drivers, there would be little use in fighting.
If our institutions at the North do not produce better,
more humane, and more courageous men than those of
the South, when taken in the mass, there is no reason
for the sacrifice of blood and treasure in their support.
War must be always cruel; it is not to be waged on
principles of tenderness; but a just, a religious
war can be waged only mercifully, with no excess,
with no circumstance of avoidable suffering. Our
enemies are our outward consciences, and their reproaches
may warn us of our dangers.
The soldiers of the Northern army generally are men
capable of understanding the force of moral considerations.
They are intelligent, independent, vigorous,—as
good material as an army ever was formed from.
A large proportion of them have gone to the war from
the best motives, and with clear appreciation of the
nature and grounds of the contest. But they require
to be confirmed in their principles, and to be strengthened
against the temptations of life in the camp and in
the field, by the voice and support of the communities
from which they have come. If the country is
careless or indifferent as to their moral standard,
they will inevitably become so themselves, and lose
the perception of the objects for which they are fighting,
forgetting their responsibilities, not only as soldiers,
but as good men. It is one of the advantages
of defeat to force the thoughts which camp-life may
have rendered unfamiliar back into the soldier’s
mind. The boastfulness of the advance is gone,—and
there is chance for sober reflection.