The time has arrived when it is possibly proper that I should make a note of the base ingratitude of Barkis, M.D.  I have hesitated to do this hitherto for several reasons, any one of which would prove a valid excuse for my not doing so.  To begin with, I have known Barkis ever since he was a baby.  I have tossed him in the air, to his own delight and to the consternation of his mother, who feared lest I should fail to catch him on his way down, or that I should underestimate the distance between the top of his head and the ceiling on his way up.  Later I have held him on my knee and told him stories of an elevating nature—­mostly of my own composition—­and have afterwards put these down upon paper and sold them to syndicates at great profit.  So that, in a sense, I am beholden to Barkis for some measure of my prosperity.  Then, when Barkis grew older, I taught him the most approved methods of burning his fingers on the Fourth of July, and when he went to college I am convinced that he gained material aid from me in that I loaned him my college scrap-books, which contained, among other things, a large number of examination papers which I marvel greatly to-day that I was ever able successfully to pass, and which gave to him some hint as to the ordeal he was about to go through.  In his younger professional days, also, I have been Barkis’s friend, and have called him up, to minister to a pain I never had, at four o’clock in the morning, simply because I had reason to believe that he needed four or five dollars to carry him through the ensuing hours of the day.

Quotation books have told us that in love, as well as in war, all is fair, and if this be true Barkis’s ingratitude, the narration of which cannot now give pain to any one, becomes, after all, nothing more than a venial offence.  I do not place much reliance upon the ethics of quotation books generally, but when I remember my own young days, and the things I did to discredit the other fellow in that little affair which has brought so much happiness into my own life, I am inclined to nail my flag to the masthead in defence of the principle that lovers can do no wrong.  It is no ordinary stake that a lover plays for, and if he stacks the cards, and in other ways turns his back upon the guiding principles of his life, blameworthy as he may be, I shall not blame him, but shall incline rather towards applause.

On the other hand, something is due to the young ladies in the case, and as much for their sake as for any other reason have I set upon paper this narrative of the man’s ingratitude, simply telling the story and drawing no conclusions whatever.

Barkis was not endowed with much in the way of worldly possessions.  His father had died when the lad was very young, and had left the boy and his mother to struggle on alone.  But there was that in both of them which enabled the mother to feel that the boy was worth struggling for, and the boy at a very early age to realize the difficulties of the struggle, and to like the difficulties because they afforded him an opportunity to help his mother either by not giving her unnecessary trouble or in bringing to her efforts in their mutual behalf aid of a very positive kind.