Let me add at once that it is quite possible that things are done almost as badly or quite as badly in Russia or France or Germany or America; I am drawing no comparisons.  All of us human beings were made, I believe, of very similar clay, and very similar causes have been at work everywhere.  Only that excuse, so popular in England, will not prevent a smash if we stick to the old methods under the stresses ahead.  I do not see that it is any consolation to share in a general disaster.

And I am sure that there must be the most delightful and picturesque reasons why we have all this overlapping and waste and muddle in our local affairs; why, to take another example, the boundary of the Essex parishes of Newton and Widdington looks as though it had been sketched out by a drunken man in a runaway cab with a broken spring.

This Bocking-Braintree main road is, it happens, an old Stane Street, along which Roman legions marched to clean up the councils and clerks of the British tribal system two thousand years ago, and no doubt an historian could spin delightful consequences; this does not alter the fact that these quaint complications in English affairs mean in the aggregate enormous obstruction and waste of human energy.  It does not alter the much graver fact, the fact that darkens all my outlook upon the future, that we have never yet produced evidence of any general disposition at any time to straighten out or even suspend these fumbling intricacies and ineptitudes.  Never so far has there appeared in British affairs that divine passion to do things in the clearest, cleanest, least wasteful, most thorough manner that is needed to straighten out, for example, these universal local tangles.  Always we have been content with the old intricate, expensive way, and to this day we follow it....

And what I want to know, what I would like to feel much surer about than I do is, is this in our blood?  Or is it only the deep-seated habit of long ages of security, long years of margins so ample, that no waste seemed altogether wicked.  Is it, in fact, a hopeless and ineradicable trait that we stick to extravagance and confusion?

What I would like to think possible at the present time, up and down the scale from parish to province, is something of this sort.  Suppose the clerk of Braintree went to the clerk of Bocking and said:  “Look here, one of us could do the work of both of us, as well or better.  The easy times are over, and offices as well as men should be prepared to die for their country.  Shall we toss to see who shall do it, and let the other man go off to find something useful to do?” Then I could believe.  Such acts of virtue happen in the United States.  Here is a quotation from the New York World of February 15th, 1916: 

“For two unusual acts Henry Bruere may be remembered by New York longer than nine days.  Early in his incumbency he declared that his office was superfluous and should be abolished, the Comptroller assuming its duties.  He now abolishes by resignation his own connection with it, in spite of its $12,000 salary.”