[Sidenote:  Conflict between the British and the American theories was precipitated by George III.] Thus the American theory of the situation was irreconcilable with the British theory, and when parliament in 1765, with no unfriendly purpose, began laying taxes upon the Americans, thus invading the province of the colonial legislatures, the Americans refused to submit.  The ensuing quarrel might doubtless have been peacefully adjusted, had not the king, George III., happened to be entertaining political schemes which were threatened with ruin if the Americans should get a fair hearing for their side of the case.[8] Thus political intrigue came in to make the situation hopeless.  When a state of things arises, with which men’s established methods of civil government are incompetent to deal, men fall back upon the primitive method which was in vogue before civil government began to exist.  They fight it out; and so we had our Revolutionary War, and became separated politically from Great Britain.  It is worthy of note, in this connection, that the last act of parliament, which brought matters to a crisis, was the so-called Regulating Act of April, 1774, the purpose of which was to change the government of Massachusetts.  This act provided that members of the council should be appointed by the royal governor, that they should be paid by the crown and thus be kept subservient to it, that the principal executive and judicial officers should be likewise paid by the crown, and that town-meetings should be prohibited except for the sole purpose of electing town officers.  Other unwarrantable acts were passed at the same time, but this was the worst.  Troops were sent over to aid in enforcing this act, the people of Massachusetts refused to recognize its validity, and out of this political situation came the battles of Lexington and Bunker Hill.

[Footnote 8:  See my War of Independence, pp. 58-64, 69-71 (Riverside Library for Young People).]

QUESTIONS ON THE TEXT.

1.  Various claims to North America:—­

  a.  Spanish.
  b.  English.
  c.  French.

2.  What was needed to make such claims of any value?

3.  The London and Plymouth companies:—­

a.  The time and purpose of their organization. b.  The grant to the London Company. c.  The grant to the Plymouth Company. d.  The magnitude of the zones granted. e.  The peculiar provisions for the intermediate zone. f.  First attempts at settlement.

4.  To what important principle of the common charter of these two companies did the colonists persistently cling?

5.  The influence of these short-lived companies upon the settlement and government of the United States:—­

  a.  A review of the zones and their assignment.
  b.  The states of the northern zone and their origin.
  c.  The states of the southern zone and their origin.
  d.  The states of the middle zone and their origin.
  e.  The influence of the movement of population on local
      government in each zone.