Mr. WILES said that the planters were anxious to come to amicable arrangements with the people, but they were unreasonable in their demands.  The planters could not consent to be injured—­they must profit by their properties.

Mr. MASON said, that the only bone of contention was the subject of rent.  His people were outside waiting to be satisfied on that head.  He hesitated not to say, that the proprietors were entitled to rent in every instance where the laborer was unwilling to labor, and unless that subject was at once settled, it would involve both parties in endless disagreement.  He was not one of those persons alluded to by his Excellency, who circulated misrepresentations for private benefit, nor was he aware that any one in the parish in which he lived had done so.  All that he desired was the good of the country, with which his interests were identified.

Sir LIONEL—­I could not possibly be personal towards any gentleman present, for I have not the honour of knowing most of you.  My observations were not confined to any particular parish, but to the Island of Jamaica, in which the occurrences named have taken place.

Dr. RAPKY, of St. George’s—­If your Excellency will only do away with a curtain magistrate, things will go on smoothly in the parish of St. George.  This gentleman has told the people that they are entitled to the lands occupied by them, in consequence of which the parish is now in an unsettled state.

Sir LIONEL—­Who is the magistrate!

Dr. RAPKY—­Mr. Fishbourne.

Sir LIONEL—­I am afraid I cannot please you.  The question of possession of lands and houses has for the present been settled by the opinion of the Attorney-General, but it is still an undetermined question at law.  There are many persons in the island who are of opinion that the legislature had not so intended; he (Sir Lionel) was at a loss to know what they meant; seeing, however, some members of the assembly present, perhaps they would be disposed to give some information.

Mr. S.J.  DALLAS said, that it was the intention of the legislature that rent should be paid.  He thought it fair that 1s. 8d. per day should be offered the people to work five days in the week, they returning one day’s labor for the houses and grounds.

Mr. SPECIAL JUSTICE HAMILTON said that complaints had been made to him, that in many instances where the husband and wife lived in the same house, rent had been demanded of both.  The laborers had, in consequence, been thrown into a state of consternation and alarm, which accounted for the unsettled state of several properties—­a serious bone of contention had in consequence been produced.  He held a notice in his hand demanding of a laborer the enormous sum of 10s. per week for house and ground.  He had seen other notices in which 6s, 8d. and 5s. had been demanded for the same.  He did not consider that the parties issuing those notices had acted with prudence.