of our inquiry, “If thy brother that dwelleth
by thee be waxen poor, and be sold unto thee, thou
shalt not compel him to serve as a bond-servant.”
In other words, thou shalt not put him to servant’s
work—to the business, and into the condition
of domestics. In the Persian version it is translated
thus, “Thou shalt not assign to him the work
of servitude.” In the Septuagint,
“He shall not serve thee with the service of
a domestic.” In the Syriac, “Thou
shalt not employ him after the manner of servants.”
In the Samaritan, “Thou shalt not require him
to serve in the service of a servant.” In
the Targum of Onkelos, “He shall not serve thee
with the service of a household servant.”
In the Targum of Jonathan, “Thou shalt not cause
him to serve according to the usages of the servitude
of servants."[A] The meaning of the passage is, thou
shalt not assign him to the same grade, nor put him
to the same service, with permanent domestics.
The remainder of the regulation is,—“But
as an hired servant and as a sojourner shall he be
with thee.” Hired servants were not incorporated
into the families of their masters: they still
retained their own family organization, without the
surrender of any domestic privilege, honor, or authority;
and this even though they resided under the same roof
with their master. While bought servants were
associated with their master’s families at meals,
at the Passover, and at other family festivals, hired
servants and sojourners were not. Ex. xii. 44,
45; Lev. xxii. 10, 11. Hired servants were not
subject to the authority of their masters in any such
sense as the master’s wife, children, and bought
servants. Hence the only form of oppressing hired
servants spoken of in the Scriptures as practicable
to masters, is that of keeping back their wages.
To have taken away such privileges in the case under
consideration, would have been pre-eminent “rigor,”
for it was not a servant born in the house of a master,
not a minor, whose minority had been sold by the father,
neither was it one who had not yet acceded to his inheritance:
nor finally, one who had received the assignment
of his inheritance, but was working off from it an
incumbrance, before entering upon its possession and
control. But it was that of the head of a family,
who had known better days, now reduced to poverty,
forced to relinquish the loved inheritance of his
fathers, with the competence and respectful consideration
its possession secured to him, and to be indebted to
a neighbor for shelter, sustenance, and employment.
So sad a reverse, might well claim sympathy; but one
consolation cheers him in the house of his pilgrimage;
he is an Israelite—Abraham is his father,
and now in his calamity he clings closer than ever,
to the distinction conferred by his birth-right.
To rob him of this, were “the unkindest cut of
all.” To have assigned him to a grade of
service filled only by those whose permanent business