was one of the curses from that Pandora’s
box, adjusted at the time, as usual, by a compromise,
the whole advantage of which inured to the benefit
of the South, and to aggravate the burthens of the
North.’—’If there be a parallel
to it in human history, it can only be that of the
Roman Emperors, who, from the days when Julius Caesar
substituted a military despotism in the place of a
republic, among the offices which they always concentrated
upon themselves, was that of tribune of the people.
A Roman Emperor tribune of the people, is an exact
parallel to that feature in the Constitution of the
United States which makes the master the representative
of his slave.’—’The Constitution
of the United States expressly prescribes that no title
of nobility shall be granted by the United States.
The spirit of this interdict is not a rooted antipathy
to the grant of mere powerless empty titles,
but to titles of nobility; to the institution
of privileged orders of men. But what order of
men under the most absolute of monarchies, or the
most aristocratic of republics, was ever invested
with such an odious and unjust privilege as that of
the separate and exclusive representation of less
than half a million owners of slaves, in the Hall
of this House, in the chair of the Senate, and in
the Presidential mansion?’—’This
investment of power in the owners of one species of
property concentrated in the highest authorities of
the nation, and disseminated through thirteen of the
twenty-six States of the Union, constitutes a privileged
order of men in the community, more adverse to the
rights of all, and more pernicious to the interests
of the whole, than any order of nobility ever known.
To call government thus constituted a Democracy, is
to insult the understanding of mankind. To call
it an Aristocracy, is to do injustice to that form
of government. Aristocracy is the government
of the best. Its standard qualification
for accession to power is merit, ascertained
by popular election, recurring at short intervals
of time. If even that government is prone to degenerate
into tyranny, what must be the character of that form
of polity in which the standard qualification for
access to power is wealth in the possession of slaves?
It is doubly tainted with the infection of riches and
of slavery. There is no name in the language of
national jurisprudence that can define it—no
model in the records of ancient history, or in the
political theories of Aristotle, with which it can
be likened. It was introduced into the Constitution
of the United States by an equivocation—a
representation of property under the name of persons.
Little did the members of the Convention from the free
States imagine or foresee what a sacrifice to Moloch
was hidden under the mask of this concession.’—’The
House of Representatives of the U. States consists
of 223 members—all, by the letter
of the Constitution, representatives only of persons,