Mr. Hamilton.  In order that the committee may understand clearly the principles on which the General Convention acted, I think it necessary to explain some preliminary circumstances.

Sir, the natural situation of this country seems to divide its interests into different classes.  There are navigating and non-navigating States—­the Northern are properly the navigating States:  the Southern appear to possess neither the means; nor the spirit of navigation.  This difference of situation naturally produces a dissimilarity of interest and views respecting foreign commerce.  It was the interest of the Northern States that there should be no restraints on their navigation, and that they should leave full power, by a majority in Congress, to make commercial regulations in favor of their own, and in restraint of the navigation of foreigners.  The Southern States wished to impose a restraint on the Northern, by requiring that two-thirds in Congress should be requisite to pass an act in regulation of commerce:  they were apprehensive that the restraints of a navigation law would discourage foreigners, and by obliging them to employ the shipping of the Northern States would probably enhance their freight.  This being the case, they insisted strenuously on having this provision engrafted in the constitution; and the Northern States were as anxious in opposing it.  On the other hand, the small States seeing themselves embraced by the confederation upon equal terms, wished to retain the advantages which they already possessed:  the large States, on the contrary, thought it improper that Rhode Island and Delaware should enjoy an equal suffrage with themselves:  from these sources a delicate and difficult contest arose.  It became necessary, therefore, to compromise; or the Convention must have dissolved without effecting any thing.  Would it have been wise and prudent in that body, in this critical situation, to have deserted their country?  No.  Every man who hears me—­every wise man in the United States, would have condemned them.  The Convention were obliged to appoint a committee for accommodation.  In this committee the arrangement was formed as it now stands; and their report was accepted.  It was a delicate point; and it was necessary that all parties should be indulged.  Gentlemen will see, that if there had not been a unanimity, nothing could have been done:  for the Convention had no power to establish, but only to recommend a government.  Any other system would have been impracticable.  Let a Convention be called to-morrow—­let them meet twenty times; nay, twenty thousand times; they will have the same difficulties to encounter; the same clashing interests to reconcile.

But dismissing these reflections, let us consider how far the arrangement is in itself entitled to the approbation of this body.  We will examine it upon its own merits.