Col.  Edwards, member of the assembly, then arose and said, that he had long been opposed to slavery, but he had not dared to avow his sentiments.

As might be supposed, the meeting adjourned without effecting the object for which it was convened.

When the question came before the colonial assembly, similar discussions ensued, and finally the bill for immediate emancipation passed both bodies unanimously.  It was an evidence of the spirit of selfish expediency, which prompted the whole procedure, that they clogged the emancipation bill with the proviso that a certain governmental tax on exports, called the four and a half per cent tax[A], should be repealed.  Thus clogged, the bill was sent home for sanction, but it was rejected by parliament, and sent back with instructions, that before it could receive his majesty’s seal, it must appear wholly unencumbered with extraneous provisoes.  This was a great disappointment to the legislature, and it so chagrined them that very many actually withdrew their support from the bill for emancipation, which passed finally in the assembly only by the casting vote of the speaker.

[Footnote A:  We subjoin the following brief history of the four and a half per cent. tax, which we procured from the speaker of the assembly.  In the rein of Charles II., Antigua was conquered by the French, and the inhabitants were forced to swear allegiance to the French government.  In a very short time the French were driven off the island and the English again took possession of it.  It was then declared, by order of the king, that as the people had, by swearing allegiance to another government, forfeited the protection of the British government, and all title to their lands, they should not again receive either, except on condition of paying to the king a duty of four and a half per cent on every article exported from the island—­and that they were to do in perpetuity.  To this hard condition they were obliged to submit, and they have groaned under the onerous duty ever since.  On every occasion, which offered any hope, they have sought the repeal of the tax, but have uniformly been defeated.  When they saw that the abolition question was coming to a crisis, they resolved to make a last effort for the repeal of the four and a half percent duty.  They therefore adopted immediate emancipation, and then, covered as they were, with the laurels of so magnanimous an act, they presented to parliament their cherished object.  The defeat was a humiliating one, and it produced such a reaction in the island, as well nigh led to the rescinding of the abolition bill.]

The verbal and written statements of numerous planters also confirm the declaration that emancipation was a measure solely of selfish policy.

Said Mr. Bernard, of Green Castle estate “Emancipation was preferred to apprenticeship, because it was attended with less trouble, and left the planters independent, instead of being saddled with a legion of stipendiary magistrates.”