xix. 24; 2 Sam. ix. 6. “The driving of Jehu the SON (grandson) of Nimshi.” 2 Kings ix. 20.  See also Ruth iv. 17; 2 Sam. xxi. 6; Gen. xxxi. 55.  Shall we forbid the inspired writer to use the same word when speaking of Noah’s grandson?  Further, Ham was not the “younger son.”  The order of enumeration makes him the second son.  If it be said that Bible usage varies, the order of birth not always being observed in enumerations; the reply is, that, enumeration in that order, is the rule, in any other order the exception.  Besides, if a younger member of a family takes precedence of older ones in the family record, it is a mark of pre-eminence, either in endowments, or providential instrumentality.  Abraham, though sixty years younger than his eldest brother, stands first in the family genealogy.  Nothing in Ham’s history shows him pre-eminent; besides, the Hebrew word Hakkatan rendered “the younger,” means the little, small.  The same word is used in Isa. lx. 22.  “A LITTLE ONE shall become a thousand.”  Isa. xxii. 24. “All vessels of SMALL quantity.”  Ps. cxv. 13. “He will bless them that fear the Lord both SMALL and great.”  Ex. xviii, 22. “But every SMALL matter they shall judge.”  It would be a literal rendering of Gen. ix. 24, if it were translated thus, “when Noah knew what his little son,"[B] or grandson (Beno Hakkatan) “had done unto him, he said cursed be Canaan,” &c.  Further, even if the Africans were the descendants of Canaan, the assumption that their enslavement fulfils this prophecy, lacks even plausibility, for, only a fraction of the inhabitants of Africa have at any time been the slaves of other nations.  If the objector say in reply, that a large majority of the Africans have always been slaves at home, we answer:  It is false in point of fact, though zealously bruited often to serve a turn; and if it were true, how does it help the argument?  The prophecy was, “Cursed be Canaan, a servant of servants shall he be unto his BRETHREN.,” not unto himself!

[Footnote A:  So av, the Hebrew word for father, signifies any ancestor, however remote. 2 Chron. xvii. 3; xxviii. 1; xxxiv. 2; Dan. v. 2.]

[Footnote B:  The French follows the same analogy; grandson being petit fils (little son.)]

OBJECTION II.—­“If a man smite his servant or his maid with a rod, and he die under his hand, he shall surely be punished.  Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished, for he is his money.” Ex. xxi. 20, 21.  What was the design of this regulation?  Was it to grant masters an indulgence to beat servants with impunity, and an assurance, that if they beat them to death, the offence should not be capital?  This is substantially what commentators tell us.  What Deity do such men worship?  Some blood-gorged