47. In a word, such was the political condition
of the Strangers, that the Jewish polity offered a
virtual bounty, to such as would become permanent
servants, and thus secure those privileges already
enumerated, and for their children in the second generation
a permanent inheritance. Ezek. xlvii. 21-23.
None but the monied aristocracy would be likely to
decline such offers. On the other hand, the Israelites,
owning all the soil, and an inheritance of land being
a sacred possession, to hold it free of incumbrance
was with every Israelite, a delicate point, both of
family honor and personal character. 1 Kings xxi.
3. Hence, to forego the control of one’s
inheritance, after the division of the paternal domain,
or to be kept out of it after having acceded to it,
was a burden grievous to be borne. To mitigate
as much as possible such a calamity, the law released
the Israelitish servant at the end of six years[A];
as, during that time—if of the first class—the
partition of the patrimonial land might have taken
place; or, if of the second, enough money might have
been earned to disencumber his estate, and thus he
might assume his station as a lord of the soil.
If neither contingency had occurred, then after another
six years the opportunity was again offered, and so
on, until the jubilee. So while strong motives
urged the Israelite to discontinue his service as
soon as the exigency had passed which made him a servant,
every consideration impelled the Stranger to
prolong his term of service; and the same kindness
which dictated the law of six years’ service
for the Israelite, assigned as a general rule, a much
longer period to the Gentile servant, who had every
inducement to protract the term. It should be
borne in mind, that adult Jews ordinarily became servants,
only as a temporary expedient to relieve themselves
from embarrassment, and ceased to be such when that
object was effected. The poverty that forced
them to it was a calamity, and their service was either
a means of relief, or a measure of prevention; not
pursued as a permanent business, but resorted to on
emergencies—a sort of episode in the main
scope of their lives. Whereas with the Strangers,
it was a permanent employment, pursued both
as a means of bettering their own condition,
and that of their posterity, and as an end for
its own sake, conferring on them privileges, and a
social estimation not otherwise attainable.
[Footnote A: Another reason for protracting the service until the seventh year, seems to have been the coincidence of that period with other arrangements, in the Jewish economy. Its pecuniary responsibilities, social relations, and general internal structure, were graduated upon a septennial scale. Besides as those Israelites who became servants through poverty, would not sell themselves, till other expedients to recruit their finances had failed—(Lev. xxv. 35)—their becoming servants proclaimed such a state of their affairs, as demanded the labor of a course of years fully to reinstate them.]