earns twenty dollars a month, instead of twelve.  Now as he is no longer called “hired,” and as he still works my farm, suppose my neighbours sagely infer, that since he is not my “hired” laborer, I rob him of his earnings and with all the gravity of owls, pronounce the oracular decision, and hoot it abroad.  My neighbors are deep divers!—­like some theological professors, they not only go to the bottom but come up covered with the tokens.]

A variety of particulars are recorded distinguishing hired from bought servants. (1.) Hired servants were paid daily at the close of their work.  Lev. xix 13; Deut. xxiv. 14, 15; Job. vii. 2; Matt. xx. 8. “Bought” servants were paid in advance, (a reason for their being called bought,) and those that went out at the seventh year received a gratuity.  Deut. xv. 12, 13. (2.) The “hired” were paid in money, the “bought” received their gratuity, at least, in grain, cattle, and the product of the vintage.  Deut. xiv. 17. (3.) The “hired” lived in their own families, the “bought” were part of their masters’ families. (4.) The “hired” supported their families out of their wages:  the “bought” and their families were supported by the master besides their wages.  The “bought” servants were, as a class, superior to the hired—­were more trust-worthy, had greater privileges, and occupied a higher station in society. (1.) They were intimately incorporated with the family of the masters, were guests at family festivals, and social solemnities, from which hired servants were excluded.  Lev. xxii. 10; Ex. xii, 43, 45. (2.) Their interests were far more identified with those of their masters’ family.  They were often, actually or prospectively, heirs of their masters’ estates, as in the case of Eliezer, of Ziba, and the sons of Bilhah and Zilpah.  When there were no sons, or when they were unworthy, bought servants were made heirs.  Prov. xvii. 2.  We find traces of this usage in the New Testament.  “But when the husbandmen saw him, they reasoned among themselves, saying, this is the heir, come let us kill him, that the inheritance may be ours.” Luke xx. 14.  In no instance does a hired servant inherit his master’s estate. (3.) Marriages took place between servants and their master’s daughters.  Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.  And Sheshan gave his daughter to Jarha his servant to wife. 1 Chron. ii. 34, 35.  There is no instance of a hired servant forming such an alliance. (4.) Bought servants and their descendants were treated with the same affection and respect as the other members of the family.[A].  The treatment of Abraham’s servants, Gen. xxv.—­the intercourse between Gideon and his servant, Judg. vii. 10, 11; Saul and his servant, 1 Sam. iv. 5, 22; Jonathan and his servant, 1 Sam. xiv. 1-14, and Elisha and his servant, are illustrations.  No such tie seems to have existed