Polybius as blaming the Romans for neglecting it;[259]
certainly, he adds, they never wished that the State
should regulate the education of children, or that
it should be all on one model; the Greeks took much
unnecessary trouble about it. The Greeks of his
own time whom Cicero knew did not inspire him with
any exalted idea of the results of Greek education;
but we should like to know whether in this book of
his work on the State he did not express some feeling
that on the children themselves, and therefore on
their training, the fortunes of the State depend.
Such had been the feeling of the old Romans, though
their State laid down no laws for education, but trusted
to the force of tradition and custom. Old Cato
believed himself to be acting like an old Roman when
he looked after the washing and dressing of his baby,
and guided the child with personal care as he grew
up, writing books for his use in large letters with
his own hand.[260] But since Cato’s day the idea
of the State had lost strength; and this had an unfortunate
effect on education, as on married life. The
one hope of the age, the Stoic philosophy, was concerned
with those who had attained to reason,
i.e. to
those who had reached their fourteenth year; in the
Stoic view the child was indeed potentially reasonable,
and thus a subject of interest, but in the Stoic ethics
education does not take a very prominent place.[261]
We are driven to the conclusion that a real interest
in education as distinct from the acquisition of knowledge
was as much wanting at Rome in Cicero’s day as
it has been till lately in England; and that it was
not again awakened until Christianity had made the
children sacred, not only because the Master so spoke
of them, but because they were inheritors of eternal
life.
Yet there had once been a Roman home education admirably
suited to bring up a race of hardy and dutiful men
and women. It was an education in the family
virtues, thereafter to be turned to account in the
service of the State. The mother nursed her own
children and tended them in their earliest years.
Then followed an education which we may call one in
bodily activity, in demeanour, in religion, and in
duty to the State. It is true that we have hardly
any evidence of this but tradition; but when Varro,
in one of the precious fragments of his book on education,
describes his own bringing up in his Sabine home at
Reate, we may be fairly sure that it adequately represents
that of the old Roman farmer.[262] He tells us that
he had a single tunic and toga, was seldom allowed
a bath, and was made to learn to ride bareback—which
reminds us of the life of the young Boer of the Transvaal
before the late war. In another fragment he also
tells us that both boys and girls used to wait on
their parents at table.[263] Cato the elder, in a
fragment preserved by Festus,[264] says that he was
brought up from his earliest years to be frugal, hardy,
and industrious, and worked steadily on the farm (in
the Sabine country), in a stony region where he had
to dig and plant the flinty soil. The tradition
of such a healthy rearing remained in the memory of
the Romans, and associated itself with the Sabines
of central Italy, the type of men who could be called
frugi: