upon his own head the ashes of disgrace—and
with his own blundering hands, so stained his character
as a man of honour and high principles, that the mark
can never be effaced. All the most offensive
attacks on the writings of Wordsworth and Southey,
had been made by Mr. Jeffrey before his visit to Keswick.
Yet, does Coleridge receive him with open arms, according
to his own account—listen, well-pleased,
to all his compliments—talk to him for
hours on his Literary Projects—dine with
him as his guest at an Inn—tell him that
he knew Mr. Wordsworth would be most happy to see
him—and in all respects behave to him with
a politeness bordering on servility. And after
all this, merely because his own vile verses were
crumpled up like so much waste paper, by the grasp
of a powerful hand in the Edinburgh Review, he accuses
Mr. Jeffrey of abusing hospitality which he never
received, and forgets, that instead of being the Host,
he himself was the smiling and obsequious Guest of
the man he pretends to have despised. With all
this miserable forgetfulness of dignity and self-respect,
he mounts the high horse, from which he instantly is
tumbled into the dirt; and in his angry ravings collects
together all the foul trash of literary gossip to
fling at his adversary, but which is blown stifling
back upon himself with odium and infamy. But let
him call to mind his own conduct, and talk not of
Mr. Jeffrey. Many witnesses are yet living of
his own egotism and malignity; and often has he heaped
upon his “beloved Friend, the laurel-honouring
Laureate,” epithets of contempt, and pity, and
disgust, though now it may suit his paltry purposes
to worship and idolize. Of Mr. Southey we at all
times think, and shall speak, with respect and admiration;
but his open adversaries are, like Mr. Jeffrey, less
formidable than his unprincipled Friends. When
Greek and Trojan meet on the plain, there is an interest
in the combat; but it is hateful and painful to think,
that a hero should be wounded behind his back, and
by a poisoned stiletto in the hand of a false Friend.
The concluding chapter of this Biography is perhaps the most pitiful of the whole, and contains a most surprising mixture of the pathetic and the ludicrous.
“Strange,” says he, “as the delusion may appear, yet it is most true, that three years ago I did not know or believe that I had an enemy in the world; and now even my strongest consolations of gratitude are mingled with fear, and I reproach myself for being too often disposed to ask,—Have I one friend?”
We are thus prepared for the narration of some grievous cruelty, or ingratitude, or malice—some violation of his peace, or robbery of his reputation; but our readers will start when they are informed, that this melancholy lament is occasioned solely by the cruel treatment which his poem of Christabel received from the Edinburgh Review and other periodical Journals! It was, he tells us, universally admired in manuscript—he