The difficulty in the accounts seems to have arisen
from the fact that payments for the Sistine Chapel
and the tomb had been mixed up. The letter to
Spina runs as follows: “There is no reason
for sending a power of attorney about the tomb of
Pope Julius, because I do not want to plead. They
cannot bring a suit if I admit that I am in the wrong;
so I assume that I have sued and lost, and have to
pay; and this I am disposed to do, if I am able.
Therefore, if the Pope will help me in the matter—and
this would be the greatest satisfaction to me, seeing
I am too old and ill to finish the work—he
might, as intermediary, express his pleasure that
I should repay what I have received for its performance,
so as to release me from this burden, and to enable
the relatives of Pope Julius to carry out the undertaking
by any master whom they may choose to employ.
In this way his Holiness could be of very great assistance
to me. Of course I desire to reimburse as little
as possible, always consistently with justice.
His Holiness might employ some of my arguments, as,
for instance, the time spent for the Pope at Bologna,
and other times wasted without any compensation, according
to the statements I have made in full to Ser Giovan
Francesco (Fattucci). Directly the terms of restitution
have been settled, I will engage my property, sell,
and put myself in a position to repay the money.
I shall then be able to think of the Pope’s orders
and to work; as it is, I can hardly be said to live,
far less to work. There is no other way of putting
an end to the affair more safe for myself, nor more
agreeable, nor more certain to ease my mind. It
can be done amicably without a lawsuit. I pray
to God that the Pope may be willing to accept the
mediation, for I cannot see that any one else is fit
to do it.”
Giorgio Vasari says that he came in the year 1525
for a short time as pupil to Michelangelo. In
his own biography he gives the date, more correctly,
1524. At any rate, the period of Vasari’s
brief apprenticeship was closed by a journey which
the master made to Rome, and Buonarroti placed the
lad in Andrea del Sarto’s workshop. “He
left for Rome in haste. Francesco Maria, Duke
of Urbino, was again molesting him, asserting that
he had received 16,000 ducats to complete the tomb,
while he stayed idling at Florence for his own amusement.
He threatened that, if he did not attend to the work,
he would make him suffer. So, when he arrived
there, Pope Clement, who wanted to command his services,
advised him to reckon with the Duke’s agents,
believing that, for what he had already done, he was
rather creditor than debtor. The matter remained
thus.” We do not know when this journey
to Rome took place. From a hint in the letter
of December 24, 1524, to Fattucci, where Michelangelo
observes that only he in person would be able to arrange
matters, it is possible that we may refer it to the
beginning of 1525. Probably he was able to convince,
not only the Pope, but also the Duke’s agents
that he had acted with scrupulous honesty, and that
his neglect of the tomb was due to circumstances over
which he had no control, and which he regretted as
acutely as anybody. There is no shadow of doubt
that this was really the case. Every word written
by Michelangelo upon the subject shows that he was
heart-broken at having to abandon the long-cherished
project.