“But all this means, you extraordinary young person, that you’re not in the least an enfant du siecle!” he cried. “It means that you’re dropped down in this groaning, heavy-spirited twentieth century, troubled about many things, from the exact year that was the golden climax of the Renaissance; that you’re a perfect specimen of the high-hearted, glorious ...” he qualified on a second thought, “unless your astonishing capacity to analyze it all, comes from the nineteenth century?”
“No, that comes from Father,” explained Sylvia, laughing. “Isn’t it funny, using the tool Father taught me to handle, against his ideas! He’s just great on analysis. As soon as we were old enough to think at all, he was always practising us on analysis—especially of what made us want things, or not like them. It’s one of his sayings—he’s always getting it off to his University classes—that if you have once really called an emotion or an ambition by its right name, you have it by the tail, so to speak—that if you know, for instance, that it’s your vanity and not your love that’s wounded by something, you’ll stop caring. But I never noticed that it really worked if you cared hard enough. Diagnosing a disease doesn’t help you any, if you keep right on being sick with it.”
“My dear! My dear!” cried the man, leaning towards her again, and looking—dazzled—into the beauty and intelligence of her eyes, “the idea that you are afflicted with any disease could only occur to the morbid mind of the bluest-nosed Puritan who ever cut down a May-pole! You’re wonderfully, you’re terrifyingly, you are superbly sound and vigorous!”