have never come near enough to human life, in its
individual characteristics, to be plastic for the expression
of those emotions to which we desire to give the immortality
of stone in memory of departed friends. The
Romantique,
however, confined to no rigid types of external form,
out of its noble freedom is capable of giving “a
local habitation and a name” to a thousand affections
which hitherto have wandered unseen from heart to
heart, or been palpable only in words and gestures
which disturb our sympathies for a while and then die.
Probably the most remarkable indication of this capacity,
as yet shown, is contained in a tomb erected by Constant
Dufeux in the Cimetiere du Sud, near Paris, for the
late Admiral Dumont d’Urville. This structure
contains in its outlines a symbolic expression of human
life, death, and immortality, and in its details an
architectural version of the character and public
services of the distinguished deceased. The finest
and most eloquent resources of color and the chisel
are brought to bear on the work; and the whole, combined
by a very sensitive and delicate feeling for proportion,
thus embodies one of the most expressive elegies ever
written. The tomb of Madame Delaroche,
nee
Vernet, in the Cimetiere Montmartre, by Duban, is
another remarkable instance of this elastic capacity
of Greek lines; and though taken frankly, in its general
form, from a common Gothic type, its chaste and graceful
freedom from Gothic restrictions in detail gives it
a life and poetic expressiveness which must be exceedingly
grateful to the Love which commanded its erection.
Paris thus affords us, in its modern architecture,
a happy proof of the inevitable reforming and refining
tendencies of the abstract lines of Greece, when properly
understood and fairly applied. Under their influence
old things have been made new, and the coldness and
hardness of Academic Art have been warmed and softened
into life. Through the agency of the Romantique
school, perhaps more new and directly symbolic architectural
expressions have been uttered within the last four
years than within the last four centuries combined.
Like the gestures of pantomime, which constitute an
instinctive and universal language, these abstract
lines, coming out of our humanity and rendered elegant
by the idealization of study, are restoring to architecture
its highest capacity of conveying thought in a monumental
manner. One of the most dangerous results of
that eclecticism which the advanced state of our archaeological
knowledge has made the principal characteristic of
modern design consists in the fatal facility thus afforded
us of availing ourselves of vast resources of forms
and combinations ready-made to suit almost all the
exigencies of composition, as we have understood it.
The public has thus been made so familiar with the
set variations of classic orders and Palladian windows
and cornices, with all manner of Gothic chamfers and
cuspidations and foliations, and the other conventional