their master, but teacher, friend, brother, and strive
like him to practice all they pray; to incarnate and
make real the Word of God, these men I honor far more
than the saints of old.... Racks and fagots soon
waft the soul to God, stern messengers, but swift.
A boy could bear that passage,—the martyrdom
of death. But the temptation of a long life of
neglect, and scorn, and obloquy, and shame, and want,
and desertion by false friends; to live blameless
though blamed, cut off from human sympathy, that is
the martyrdom of to-day. I shed no tears for
such martyrs. I shout when I see one; I take courage
and thank God for the real saints, prophets and heroes
of to-day.... Yea, though now men would steal
the rusty sword from underneath the bones of a saint
or hero long deceased, to smite off therewith the
head of a new prophet, that ancient hero’s son;
though they would gladly crush the heart out of him
with the tombstones they piled up for great men, dead
and honored now; yet in some future day, that mob
penitent, baptized with a new spirit, like drunken
men returned to sanity once more, shall search through
all this land for marble white enough to build a monument
to that prophet whom their fathers slew; they shall
seek through all the world for gold of fineness fit
to chronicle such names. I cannot wait; but I
will honor such men now, not adjourn the warning of
their voice, and the glory of their example, till
another age! The church may cast out such men;
burn them with the torments of an age too refined in
its cruelty to use coarse fagots and the vulgar axe!
It is no loss to these men; but the ruin of the church.
I say the Christian church of the nineteenth century
must honor such men, if it would do a church’s
work; must take pains to make such men as these, or
it is a dead church, with no claim on us, except that
we bury it. A true church will always be the
church of martyrs. The ancients commenced every
great work with a victim! We do not call it so;
but the sacrifice is demanded, got ready, and offered
by unconscious priests long ere the enterprise succeeds.
Did not Christianity begin with a martyrdom?
* * * *
*
From “Historic Americans.”
=_170._= CHARACTER OF FRANKLIN.
His was the morality of a strong, experienced person,
who had seen the folly of wise men, the meanness of
proud men, the baseness of honorable men, and the
littleness of great men, and made liberal allowances
for the failures of all men. If the final end
to be reached were just, he did not always inquire
about the provisional means which led thither.
He knew that the right line is the shortest distance
between two points, in morals as in mathematics, but
yet did not quarrel with such as attained the point
by a crooked line. Such is the habit of politicians,
diplomatists, statesmen, who look on all men as a commander
looks on his soldiers, and does not ask them to join
the church or keep their hands clean, but to stand
to their guns and win the battle.