Hood died in 1845, and was then only forty-six or forty-seven years old.  Alike esteemed by the poor and the rich, both united to consecrate a monument to his memory.  Kindly should we ever think of those who make our hearts and our tempers bright; who, without pomp of wisdom, help us to a cheerfulness which no proud philosophy can give; who, in the motley of checkered mirth and wit, sparkle on the resting-spots of life.  Such men are rare, and as valuable as they are rare.  The world wants them more than it wants heroes and victors:  for mirth is better than massacre; and it is surely better to hear laughter sounding aloud the jubilee of the heart, than the shout of battle and yell of conquest.  Precious, then, are those whose genius brings pleasure to the bosom and sunshine to the face; who not only call our thoughts into festive action, but brighten our affections into generous feeling.  Though we may not loudly celebrate such men, we greatly miss them; and not on marble monuments, but in our warmest memories, their names continue fresh.  But laugh and make laugh as they may, they, too, have the destiny of grief; and unto them, as unto all men, come their passages of tragedy,—­the days of evil, the nights of waking, and the need of pity.

When Hood was near his death a pension of a hundred pounds a year was settled on his wife, at the instance of Sir Robert Peel.  The wife, so soon to become a widow, did not long survive her husband; then, in 1847, the pension was continued to their two orphan children, at the instance of Lord John Russell.  Politics and parties were forgotten, in gratitude to an earnest lover of his kind; and the people, as well as the government, in helping to provide for those whom he left behind, showed that they had not forgotten one whose desire it was to improve even more than to amuse them.  And still we cannot but feel sad that there should ever have been this need.  Nor would there have been, had Hood had the strength to carry him into the vast reading public which has arisen since his death, and which it was not his fate to know.  “The income,” says his daughter, “which his works now produce to his children, might then have prolonged his life for many years.”

We have written more on the personal relations of Hood than we had intended; but we have been carried on unwitttingly, while reading the “Memorials” of him recently published and edited by his children.  The loving worth of the man, as therein revealed, made us slow to quit the companionship of his character to discuss the qualities of his genius.  We trust that our time has not been misspent, morally or critically; for, besides the moral good which we gain from the contemplation of an excellent man, we enjoy also the critical satisfaction of learning that whatever is best in literature comes out of that which is best in life.  We therefore close this section of our article with a bit of prose and a bit of poetry, among Hood’s “last things,”—­personally and pathetically characteristic of his nature and his genius.