these two philosophers, the English chemist, Robert
Boyle, effected a successful synthesis of both.
The son of Richard Boyle, Earl of Cork, he was born
at Lismore in 1626, lived in literary retirement at
Oxford from 1654, and later in Cambridge, and died,
1692, in London, president of the Royal Society.
His principal work,
The Sceptical Chemist (Works,
vol. i. p. 290
seq.), appeared in 1661, the
tract,
De Ipsa Natura, in 1682.[1] By his introduction
of the atomic conception he founded an epoch in chemistry,
which, now for the first, was freed from bondage to
the ideas of Aristotle and the alchemists. Atomism,
however, was for Boyle merely an instrument of method
and not a philosophical theory of the world.
A sincerely religious man,[2] he regards with disfavor
both the atheism of Epicurus and his complete rejection
of teleology—the world-machine points to
an intelligent Creator and a purpose in creation;
motion, to a divine impulse. He defends, on the
other hand, the right of free inquiry against the
priesthood and the pedantry of the schools, holding
that the supernatural must be sharply distinguished
from the natural, and mere conjectures concerning
insoluble problems from positions susceptible of experimental
proof; while, in opposition to submission to authority,
he remarks that the current coin of opinion must be
estimated, not by the date when and the person by whom
it was minted but by the value of the metal alone.
Cartesian elements in Boyle are the start from doubt,
the derivation of all motion from pressure and impact,
and the extension of the mechanical explanation to
the organic world. His inquiries relate exclusively
to the world of matter so far as it was “completed
on the last day but one of creation.” He
defends empty space against Descartes and Hobbes.
He is the first to apply the mediaeval terms, primary
and secondary qualities, to the antithesis between
objective properties which really belong to things,
and sensuous or subjective qualities present only
in the feeling subject.[3]
[Footnote 1: Boyle’s Works were
published in Latin at Geneva, in 1660, in six volumes,
and in 1714 in five; an edition by Birch appeared at
London, 1744, in five volumes, second edition, 1772,
in six. Cf. Buckle, History of Civilization
in England, vol. i. chap. vii. pp. 265-268; Lange,
History of Materialism, vol. i. pp. 298-306;
vol. ii. p. 351 seq.; Georg Baku, Der Streit
ueber den Naturbegriff, Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie,
vol. xcviii., 1891, p. 162 seq.]
[Footnote 2: The foundation named after him had
for its object to promote by means of lectures the
investigation of nature on the basis of atomism, and,
at the same time, to free it from the reproach of leading
to atheism and to show its harmony with natural religion.
Samuel Clarke’s work on The Being and Attributes
of God, 1705, originated in lectures delivered
on this foundation.]