inbred naturalism of the modern period has not only
asserted itself, amalgamated with Kantian elements,
in the realistic metaphysics and mechanical psychology
of Herbart and in the system of Schopenhauer, as a
lateral current by the side of Fichte, Schelling, and
Hegel, but, under the influence of the new and powerful
development of the natural sciences, has once more
confidently risen against the traditions of the idealistic
school, although now it is tempered by criticism and
concedes to the practical ideals at least a refuge
in faith. The conviction that the rule of neo-Kantianism
is provisional does not rest merely on the mutability
of human affairs. The widespread active study
of the philosophy of the great Koenigsberger gives
ground for the hope that also those elements in it
from which the systems of the idealists have proceeded
as necessary consequences will again find attention
and appreciation. The perception of the fact
that the naturalistico-mechanical view represents
only a part, a subordinate part, of the truth will
lead to the further truth, that the lower can only
be explained by the higher. We shall also learn
more and more to distinguish between the permanent
import of the position of fundamental idealism and
the particular form which the constructive thinkers
have given it; the latter may fall before legitimate
assaults, but the former will not be affected by them.
The revival of the Fichteo-Hegelian idealism by
means of a method which shall do justice to the demands
of the time by a closer adherence to experience, by
making general use of both the natural and the mental
sciences, and by an exact and cautious mode of argument—this
seems to us to be the task of the future.
The most important of the post-Hegelian systems, the
system of Lotze, shows that the scientific spirit
does not resist reconciliation with idealistic convictions
in regard to the highest questions, and the consideration
which it on all sides enjoys, that there exists a strong
yearning in this direction. But when a deeply
founded need of the time becomes active, it also rouses
forces which dedicate themselves to its service and
which are equal to the work.
THE END.
* * * * *
INDEX.
Abbt
Absolute, the
Fichte on
Schelling on
F. Krause on
Schleiermacher on
Hegel on
Fortlage on
Spencer on
Boestrom on
Strauss on
Feuerbach on the theistic school on
Lotze on
Hartmann on
See also
God the Unconditioned
Achillini
Adamson, R.
Aesthetics of Home (Lord Kames) of Burke of
Baumgarten of Herder of Kant of Schiller of
Schelling of Hegel of J.F. Fries of Herbart
of Schopenhauer
Agnosticism, of Spencer
Agricola, R.
Agrippa of Nettesheim
Ahrens, H.
Alexandrists
Allihn
Althusius
Anderson
Angiulli, A.
Annet, P.
Antal, G. von