away, a spring, a
falling away, which consists
in the soul’s grasping itself in its selfhood,
in its subordination of the infinite in itself to
the finite, and in its thus ceasing to be in God.
The procession of the world from the infinite is a
free act, a fact which can only be described, not deduced
as necessary. The counterpart of this attainment
of independence on the part of things or creation
is history as the return of the world to its source.
They are related to each other as the fall to redemption.
Both the dismission of the world and its reception
back, together with the intervening development, are,
however, events needed by God himself in order to become
actual God: He develops through the world. (A
similar thought was not unknown in the Middle Ages:
if God is to give a complete revelation of himself
he must make known his grace; and this presupposes
sin. As the occasion of divine grace, the fall
is a happy, saving fault; without it God could not
have revealed himself as gracious, as forgiving, hence
not completely.) Schelling’s study of Jacob
Boehme, to which he was led by Baader, essentially
contributed to the concentration of his thought on
this point.
The Exposition of the True Relation,
etc., already distinctly betrays the influence
of this mystic. In correspondence with Boehme’s
doctrine that God is living God only through his inclusion
of negation in himself, it is here maintained:
A being can manifest itself only when it is not merely
one, but has another, an opposition (the many), in
itself, whereby it is revealed to itself as unity.
With the addition of certain Kantian ideas, in particular
the idea of transcendental freedom and the intelligible
character, Schelling’s theosophy now assumes
the following form:
The only way to guard against the determinism and
the lifeless God of Spinoza is to assume something
in God which is not God himself, to distinguish between
God as existent and that which is merely the ground
of his existence or “nature in God.”
In God also the perfect proceeds from the imperfect,
he too develops and realizes himself. The actual,
perfect God, who is intelligence, wisdom, goodness,
is preceded by something which is merely the possibility
of all this, an obscure, unconscious impulse toward
self-representation. For in the last analysis
there is no being but willing; to willing alone belong
the predicates of the primal being, groundlessness,
eternity, independence of time, self-affirmation.
This “ground of existence” is an obscure
“longing” to give birth to self, an unconscious
impulse to become conscious; the goal of this longing
is the “understanding,” the Logos, the
Word, wherein God becomes revealed to self. By
the self-subordination of this longing to the understanding
as its matter and instrument, God becomes actual God,
becomes spirit and love. The operation of the
light understanding on the dark nature-will consists
in a separation of forces, whence the visible world