The parallelism of the potencies of nature, as we have developed it by leaving out of account the numerous differences between the various expositions of the Naturphilosophie, may be shown by a table:
I. UNIVERSAL NATURE. II. INORGANIC NATURE
III. ORGANIC NATURE.
(ORGANIZING)
3. Copula
3. Organization
or Life.
|
___^___
Chemical \ G | Sensi- Man.
/ \
|Process (3d| a | |bility. __^__
2. Light 2._Dynamical_|Dimen-
| l | | / \
(Soul).
Process. < sion) | v | |Irritabi-
Male
b. At- \ (Determi- |Electri- | a |_|lity. (=Light) traction.| nate |city (2d Di->n |Animal. >1. Gra- matter.) | mension.) | i | | vity 1. Indeter- |Magnetism | s |Repro- Female a. Re- | (Body) minate |(1st Di- | m |duction (-Gravity) pulsion / matter. \ mension.) / \ Plant.
%1b. Transcendental Philosophy.%
The philosophy of nature explained the products of nature teleologically, deduced them from the concept or the mission of nature, by ignoring the mechanical origin of physical phenomena and inquiring into the significance of each stage in nature in view of this ideal meaning of the whole. It asks what is the outcome of the chemical process for the whole of nature, what is given by electricity, by magnetism, etc.—what