[Footnote 5:  John S. Bassett, Professor of History at Trinity College, North Carolina, learned from a source of great respectability that Chavis not only taught the children of these distinguished families, but “was received as an equal socially and asked to table by the most respectable people of the neighborhood.”  See Bassett, Slavery in North Carolina, p. 75.]

We have no evidence of any such favorable conditions in South Carolina.  There was not much public education of the Negroes of that State even during the revolutionary epoch.  Regarding education as a matter of concern to persons immediately interested South Carolinians had long since learned to depend on private instruction for the training of their youth.  Colored schools were not thought of outside of Charleston.  Yet although South Carolina prohibited the education of the slaves in 1740[1] and seemingly that of other Negroes in 1800,[2] these measures were not considered a direct attack on the instruction of free persons of color.  Furthermore, the law in regard to the teaching of the blacks was ignored by sympathetic masters.  Colored persons serving in families and attending traveling men shared with white children the advantage of being taught at home.  Free persons of color remaining accessible to teachers and missionaries interested in the propagation of the gospel among the poor still had the opportunity to make intellectual advancement.[3]

[Footnote 1:  Brevard, Digest of the Public Statute Law of South Carolina, vol. ii., p. 243.]

[Footnote 2:  Ibid., p. 243.]

[Footnote 3:  Laws of 1740 and 1800, and Simmons, Men of Mark, p. 1078.]

Although not as reactionary as South Carolina, little could be expected of Georgia where slavery had such a firm hold.  Unfavorable as conditions in that State were, however, they were not intolerable.  It was still lawful for a slave to learn to read, and free persons of color had the privilege of acquiring any knowledge whatsoever.[1] The chief incentive to the education of Negroes in that State came from the rising Methodists and Baptists who, bringing a simple message to plain people, instilled into their minds as never before the idea that the Bible being the revelation of God, all men should be taught to read that book.[2]

[Footnote 1:  Marbury and Crawford, Digest of the Laws of the State of Georgia, p. 438.]

[Footnote 2:  Orr, Education in the South.]

In the territory known as Louisiana the good treatment of the mixed breeds and the slaves by the French assured for years the privilege to attend school.  Rev. James Flint, of Salem, Massachusetts, received letters from a friend in Louisiana, who, in pointing out conditions around him, said:  “In the regions where I live masters allow entire liberty to the slaves to attend public worship, and as far as my knowledge extends, it is generally the case in Louisiana.  We have,” said he, “regular meetings of the blacks in the building where I attend public worship.  I have in the past years devoted myself assiduously, every Sabbath morning, to the labor of learning them to read.  I found them quick of apprehension, and capable of grasping the rudiments of learning more rapidly than the whites."[1]