Two early efforts to carry out this policy are worthy of notice here.  These were the endeavors of Anthony Benezet and Thaddeus Kosciuszko.  Benezet was typical of those men, who, having the courage of their conviction, not only taught colored people, but gladly appropriated property to their education.  Benezet died in 1784, leaving considerable wealth to be devoted to the purpose of educating Indians and Negroes.  His will provided that as the estate on the death of his wife would not be sufficient entirely to support a school, the Overseers of the Public Schools of Philadelphia should join with a committee appointed by the Society of Friends, and other benevolent persons, in the care and maintenance of an institution such as he had planned.  Finally in 1787 the efforts of Benezet reached their culmination in the construction of a schoolhouse, with additional funds obtained from David Barclay of London and Thomas Sidney, a colored man of Philadelphia.  The pupils of this school were to study reading, writing, arithmetic, plain accounts, and sewing.[1]

[Footnote 1:  Special Report of the U.S.  Com. of Ed., 1871, p. 375.]

With respect to conceding the Negroes’ claim to a better education, Thaddeus Kosciuszko, the Polish general, was not unlike Benezet.  None of the revolutionary leaders were more moved with compassion for the colored people than this warrior.  He saw in education the powerful leverage which would place them in position to enjoy the newly won rights of man.  While assisting us in gaining our independence, Kosciuszko acquired here valuable property which he endeavored to devote to the enlightenment of the slaves.  He authorized Thomas Jefferson, his executor, to employ the whole thereof in purchasing Negroes and liberating them in the name of Kosciuszko, “in giving them an education in trades or otherwise, and in having them instructed for their new condition in the duties of morality.”  The instructors were to provide for them such training as would make them “good neighbors, good mothers or fathers, good husbands or wives, teaching them the duties of citizenship, teaching them to be defenders of their liberty and country, and of the good order of society, and whatsoever might make them useful and happy."[1] Clearly as this was set forth the executor failed to discharge this duty enjoined upon him.  The heirs of the donor instituted proceedings to obtain possession of the estate, which, so far as the author knows, was never used for the purpose for which it was intended.

[Footnote 1:  African Repository, vol. xi., pp. 294-295.]