for a power. A fine critic, a vivid sketcher
of character, and a writer of singular clearness,
point, and eloquence was spoiled to make an artist,
sometimes noble in conception, but without sense of
color, and utterly inadequate to any but the most
confused expression of himself by the pencil.
His very sense of the power which he was conscious
of somewhere in himself harassed and hampered him,
as time after time he refused to see that his failure
was due, not to injustice or insensibility on the part
of the world, but to his having chosen the wrong means
of making his ability felt and acknowledged.
His true place would have been that of Professor and
Lecturer in the Royal Academy. The world is not
insensible or unjust, but it knows what it wants,
and will not long be put off with less. There
is always a public for success; there never is, and
never ought to be, for inadequacy. Haydon was
in some respects a first-rate man, but the result
of his anxious, restless, and laborious life was almost
zero, as far as concerned its definite aims. It
does not convey the moral of neglected genius, or
of loose notions of money-obligations, ending in suicide,
but simply of a mischosen vocation, leading sooner
or later to utter and undeniable failure. Pas meme
academicien! Plenty of neglected geniuses
have found it good to be neglected, plenty of Jeremy
Diddlers (in letters and statesmanship as often as
in money-matters) have lived to a serene old age,
but the man who in any of the unuseful arts insists
on doing what Nature never asked him to do has no place
in the world. Leslie, a second-rate man in all
respects, but with a genuine talent rightly directed,
an obscure American, with few friends, no influential
patrons, and a modesty that would never let him obtrude
his claims, worked steadily forward to competence,
to reputation, and the Council of the Academy.
The only blunder of his life was his accepting the
Professorship of Drawing at West Point, a place for
which he was unsuited. But this blunder he had
the good sense and courage to correct by the frank
acknowledgment of resignation. Altogether his
is a career as pleasant as Haydon’s is painful
to contemplate, the more so as we feel that his success
was fairly won by honest effort directed by a contented
consciousness of the conditions and limitations of
his faculty.
Nothing can be more agreeable than the career of a successful artist. His employment does not force upon him the solitude of an author; it is eminently companionable; from its first design, through all the processes that bring his work to perfection, he is not shut out from the encouragement of sympathy; his success is definite and immediate; he can see it in the crowd around his work at the exhibition; and his very calling brings him into pleasant contact with beauty, taste, and (if a portrait-painter) with eminence in every department of human activity.