III.  The matter at issue is, whether power is to be given to Marcus Antonius of oppressing the republic, of massacring the virtuous citizens, of plundering the city, of distributing the lands among his robbers, of overwhelming the Roman people in slavery; or, whether he is not to be allowed to do all this.  Do you doubt what you are to do?  “Oh, but all this does not apply to Antonius.”  Even Cotyla would not venture to say that.  For what does not apply to him?  A man who, while he says that he is defending the acts of another, perverts all those laws of his which we might most properly praise.  Caesar wished to drain the marshes:  this man has given all Italy to that moderate man Lucius Antonius to distribute.—­What? has the Roman people adopted this law?—­What? could it be passed with a proper regard for the auspices?  But this conscientious augur acts in reference to the auspices without his colleagues.  Although those auspices do not require any interpretation;—­for who is there who is ignorant that it is impious to submit any motion to the people while it is thundering?  The tribunes of the people carried laws respecting the provinces in opposition to the acts of Caesar; Caesar had extended the provisions of his law over two years; Antonius over six years.  Has then the Roman people adopted this law?  What? was it ever regularly promulgated?  What? was it not passed before it was even drawn up?  Did we not see the deed done before we even suspected that it was going to be done?  Where is the Caecilian and Didian law?  What is become of the law that such bills should be published on three market days?  What is become of the penalty appointed by the recent Junian and Licinian law?  Can these laws be ratified without the destruction of all other laws?  Has any one had a right of entering the forum?  Moreover, what thunder, and what a storm that was! so that even if the consideration of the auspices had no weight with Marcus Antonius, it would seem strange that he could endure and bear such exceeding violence of tempest, and rain, and whirlwind.  When therefore he, as augur, says that he carried a law while Jupiter was not only thundering, but almost uttering an express prohibition of it by his clamour from heaven, will he hesitate to confess that it was carried in violation of the auspices?  What? does the virtuous augur think that it has nothing to do with the auspices, that he carried the law with the aid of that colleague whose election he himself vitiated by giving notice of the auspices?

IV.  But perhaps we, who are his colleagues, may be the interpreters of the auspices?  Do we also want interpreters of arms?  In the first place, all the approaches to the forum were so fenced round, that even if no armed men were standing in the way, still it would have been impossible to enter the forum except by tearing down the barricades.  But the guards were arranged in such a manner, that, as the access of an enemy to a city is prevented, so you