his place—in the Gallery. It was rare
sport to see him, “like an eagle in a dovecote,
flutter the Volscians in Corioli.” He has
found out the secret of attracting by repelling.
Those whom he is likely to attack are curious to hear
what he says of them: they go again, to show
that they do not mind it. It is no less interesting
to the by-standers, who like to witness this sort
of onslaught—like a charge of cavalry,
the shock, and the resistance. Mr. Irving has,
in fact, without leave asked or a licence granted,
converted the Caledonian Chapel into a Westminster
Forum or Debating Society, with the sanctity of religion
added to it. Our spirited polemic is not contented
to defend the citadel of orthodoxy against all impugners,
and shut himself up in texts of Scripture and huge
volumes of the Commentators as an impregnable fortress;—he
merely makes use of the stronghold of religion as
a resting-place, from which he sallies forth, armed
with modern topics and with penal fire, like Achilles
of old rushing from the Grecian tents, against the
adversaries of God and man. Peter Aretine is
said to have laid the Princes of Europe under contribution
by penning satires against them: so Mr. Irving
keeps the public in awe by insulting all their favourite
idols. He does not spare their politicians, their
rulers, their moralists, their poets, their players,
their critics, their reviewers, their magazine-writers;
he levels their resorts of business, their places
of amusement, at a blow—their cities, churches,
palaces, ranks and professions, refinements, and elegances—and
leaves nothing standing but himself, a mighty landmark
in a degenerate age, overlooking the wide havoc he
has made! He makes war upon all arts and sciences,
upon the faculties and nature of man, on his vices
and his virtues, on all existing institutions, and
all possible improvements, that nothing may be left
but the Kirk of Scotland, and that he may be the head
of it. He literally sends a challenge to all London
in the name of the KING of HEAVEN, to evacuate its
streets, to disperse its population, to lay aside
its employments, to burn its wealth, to renounce its
vanities and pomp; and for what?—that he
may enter in as the King of Glory; or after
enforcing his threat with the battering-ram of logic,
the grape-shot of rhetoric, and the crossfire of his
double vision, reduce the British metropolis to a Scottish
heath, with a few miserable hovels upon it, where
they may worship God according to the root of the
matter, and an old man with a blue bonnet, a fair-haired
girl, and a little child would form the flower of
his flock! Such is the pretension and the boast
of this new Peter the Hermit, who would get rid of
all we have done in the way of improvement on a state
of barbarous ignorance, or still more barbarous prejudice,
in order to begin again on a tabula rasa of
Calvinism, and have a world of his own making.
It is not very surprising that when nearly the whole