used to express passion at all, but merely the quiet
and normal state of the poet’s mind, or of his
characters, with regard to external nature; when it
is considered, as it is by most of our modern poets,
the staple of poetry, indeed poetic diction itself,
so that the more numerous and the stranger conceits
an author can cram into his verses, the finer poet
he is; then, also, it is called rant and bombast, but
of the most artificial, insincere, and (in every sense
of the word) monstrous kind; the offspring of an effeminate
nature-worship, without self-respect, without true
manhood, because it exhibits the poet as the puppet
of his own momentary sensations, and not as a man
superior to nature, claiming his likeness to the Author
of nature, by confessing and expressing the permanent
laws of Nature, undisturbed by fleeting appearances
without, or fleeting tempers within. Hence it
is that, as in all insincere and effete times, the
poetry of the day deals more and more with conceits,
and less and less with true metaphors. In fact,
hinc illae lachrymae. This is, after all, the
primary symptom of disease in the public taste, which
has set us on writing this review—that
critics all round are crying: “An ill-constructed
whole, no doubt; but full of beautiful passages”—the
word “passages” turning out to mean, in
plain English, conceits. The simplest distinction,
perhaps, between an image and a conceit is this—that
while both are analogies, the image is founded on an
analogy between the essential properties of two things—the
conceit on an analogy between its accidents.
Images, therefore, whether metaphors or similes,
deal with laws; conceits with private judgments.
Images belong to the imagination, the power which
sees things according to their real essence and inward
life, and conceits to the fancy or phantasy, which
only see things as they appear.
To give an example or two from the “Life Drama:”
His heart holds a deep hope,
As holds the wretched West the sunset’s corse—
Spit on, insulted by the brutal rains.
The passion-panting sea
Watches the unveiled beauty of the stars
Like a great hungry soul.
Great spirits,
Who left upon the mountain-tops of Death
A light that made them lovely.
The moon,
Arising from dark waves which plucked at her.
And hundreds, nay, thousands more in this book, whereof
it must be said, that beautiful or not, in the eyes
of the present generation— and many of
them are put into very beautiful language, and refer
to very beautiful natural objects—they
are not beautiful really and in themselves, because
they are mere conceits; the analogies in them are
fortuitous, depending not on the nature of the things
themselves, but on the private fancy of the writer,
having no more real and logical coherence than a conundrum
or a pun; in plain English, untrue, only allowable
to Juliets or Othellos; while their self-possession,