settled down, as the only escape from madness and
suicide, into the latter thought and believed that
she found in the ideal and perfect manhood of One whom
she was told to revere and love as a God, and who
had sacrificed His own life for her, a substitute
for that merely human affection from which she was
for ever debarred? Why blame her for not numbering
that which was wanting, or making straight that which
was crooked? Let God judge her, not we:
and the fit critics of her conduct are not the easy
gentlemanlike scholars, like Mr. Vaughan’s Athertons
and Gowers, discussing the “aberrations of fanaticism”
over wine and walnuts; or the gay girl, Kate; hardly
even the happy mother, Mrs. Atherton; but those whose
hairs are gray with sorrow; who have been softened
at once and hardened in the fire of God; who have
cried out of the bottomless deep like David, while
lover and friend were hid away from them, and laid
amid the corpses of their dead hopes, dead health,
dead joy, as on a ghastly battle-field, “stript
among the dead, like those who are wounded, and cut
away from God’s hands;” who have struggled
drowning in the horrible mire of doubt, and have felt
all God’s billows and waves sweep over them,
till they were weary of crying, and their sight failed
for waiting so long upon God; and all the faith and
prayer which was left was “Thou wilt not leave
my soul in hell, nor suffer thy Holy One to see corruption.”
Be it understood, however, for fear of any mistake,
that we hold Mr. Vaughan to be simply and altogether
right in his main idea. His one test for all
these people, and all which they said or did, is—Were
they made practically better men and women thereby?
He sees clearly that the “spiritual”
is none other than the “moral”—that
which has to do with right and wrong; and he has a
righteous contempt for everything and anything, however
graceful and reverent, and artistic and devout, and
celestial and super-celestial, except in as far as
he finds it making better men and women do better
work at every-day life.
But even on this ground we must protest against such a sketch as this; even of one of the least honourable of the Middle-age saints:
ATHERTON. Angela de Foligni, who made herself miserable—I must say something the converse of flourished—about the beginning of the fourteenth century, was a fine model pupil of this sort, a genuine daughter of St. Francis. Her mother, her husband, her children dead, she is alone and sorrowful. She betakes herself to violent devotion--falls ill—suffers incessant anguish from a complication of disorders—has rapturous consolations and terrific temptations—is dashed in a moment from a seat of glory above the empyrean . . .