general proposition for an armistice in order that
the belligerent parties might have time to consider
whether, under the totally altered state of circumstances,
it would not be possible to substitute negotiations
for further bloodshed, and to obtain the results of
the war without continuing the war itself. We
did not feel it in our power to refuse our assent
to that principle. But, while in general terms
we have supported the proposition of an armistice,
we have pledged ourselves to no terms or conditions
of peace whatever. We have pledged ourselves
to nothing beyond the general advice that an armistice
should take place. The circumstances under which
that advice was given have passed. Our mediation
and our advice have not been officially asked by the
combatants, and we have abstained from giving it.
That is the present state of the matter. The
right hon. gentleman the member for Stroud (Mr. Horsman)
has asked me whether there is any expectation of an
armed mediation on the part of the French Government.
Well, it is not my duty, nor is it in my power, to
answer for other Governments, but only for our own.
All I can say is, I have not the slightest reason
to believe that any step of that kind is in contemplation,
and I have strong reasons to believe that no such
step is contemplated. [Mr. Horsman: I did not
ask that question. It was another hon. member.]
Then the question was asked by the hon. member for
Wick (Mr. Laing). Then these two questions were
put to me—first, whether the British Government
has been invited by that of France to address joint
communications to all or any of the belligerent Powers?
The French Government have taken up the matter, and
it now rests with that Government. The French
Government may or may not ask us to join in that work
of mediation; but, should they do so, I do not think
it would be the duty of the British Government to
join in any such mediation, unless we have a distinct
understanding as to the terms the French Government
will propose. The second question of the right
hon. gentleman is, whether the British Government has
expressed its readiness to concur with the Government
of France in recommending Austria to terminate the
war, by accepting the two conditions proposed by Prussia
and Italy as to her surrender of Venetia, and ceasing
to be a member of the German Confederation? Now,
Sir, as to that, Venetia has been, I understand, ceded
by Austria, and whether or not any questions will
arise as to that settlement being absolute or conditional,
I do not know; still I apprehend that none of us can
entertain a doubt that the final result will be that
Venetia must pass from Austria. Venetia has been,
in effect, conquered not by Italy but for Italy; Venetia
has been conquered in Germany. Whatever the manner
of the transfer may be—whatever may be the
precise nature of the measures adopted by France—I
do not think any reasonable man can entertain a doubt
that Venetia, at no distant period, will belong to