MANTUA DIVES AVIS

Among biographical commonplaces one frequently finds the generalization that it is the provincial who acquires the perspective requisite for a true estimate of a nation, and that it is the country-boy reared in lonely communion with himself who attains the deepest knowledge of human nature.  If there be some degree of truth in this reflection, Publius Vergilius Maro, the farmer’s boy from the Mantuan plain, was in so far favored at birth.  It is the fifteenth of October, 70 B.C., that the Mantuans still hold in pious memory:  in 1930 they will doubtless invite Italy and the devout of all nations to celebrate the twentieth centenary of the poet’s birth.

Ancient biographers, little concerned with Mendelian speculation, have not reported from what stock his family sprang.  Scientific curiosity and nationalistic egotism have compelled modern biographers to become anthropologists.  Vergil has accordingly been referred, by some critic or other, to each of the several peoples that settled the Po Valley in ancient times:  the Umbrians, the Etruscans, the Celts, the Latins.  The evidence cannot be mustered into a compelling conclusion, but it may be worth while to reject the improbable suppositions.

The name tells little. Vergilius is a good Italic nomen found in all parts of the peninsula,[1] but Latin names came as a matter of course with the gift of citizenship or of the Latin status, and Mantua with the rest of Cisalpine Gaul had received the Latin status nineteen years before Vergil’s birth.  The cognomen Maro is in origin a magistrate’s title used by Etruscans and Umbrians, but cognomina were a recent fashion in the first century B.C. and were selected by parents of the middle classes largely by accident.

[Footnote 1:  Braunholz, The Nationality of Vergil, Classical Review, 1915, 104 ff.]

Vergil himself, a good antiquarian, assures us that in the heroic age Mantua was chiefly Etruscan with enclaves of two other peoples (presumably Umbrians and Venetians).  In this he is doubtless following a fairly reliable tradition, accepted all the more willingly because of his intimacy with Maecenas, who was of course Etruscan:[2]

  Mantua dives avis, sed non genus omnibus unum,
  Gens illis triplex, populi sub gente quaterni,
  Ipsa caput populis; Tusco de sanguine vires.

[Footnote 2:  Aeneid, X, 201-3.]

Pliny seems to have supposed this passage a description of Mantua in Vergil’s own day:  Mantua Tuscorum trans Padum sola reliqua (III. 130).  That could hardly have been Vergil’s meaning, however; for the Celts who flooded the Po Valley four centuries before drove all before them except in the Venetian marshes and the Ligurian hills.  They could not have left an Etruscan stronghold in the center of their path.  Vergil was probably not Etruscan.