[89:5] Apol. i. 67.

[90:1] Dial. c.  Tryph. 103.

[90:2] Apol. i. 66; cf. S.R. i. p. 294.

[91:1] The evangelical references and allusions in Justin have been carefully collected by Credner and Hilgenfeld, and are here thrown together in a sort of running narrative.

[101:1] This was written before the appearance of Mr. M’Clellan’s important work on the Four Gospels (The New Testament, vol. i, London, 1875), to which I have not yet had time to give the study that it deserves.

[103:1] Unless indeed it was found in one of the many forms of the Gospel (cf. S.R. i.  P. 436, and p. 141 below).  The section appears in none of the forms reproduced by Dr. Hilgenfeld (N.T. extra Can.  Recept. Fasc. iv).

[107:1] In like manner Tertullian refers his readers to the ‘autograph copies’ of St. Paul’s Epistles, and the very ’chairs of the Apostles,’ preserved at Corinth and elsewhere. (De Praescript.  Haeret. c. 36).  Tertullian also refers to the census of Augustus, ’quem testem fidelissimum dominicae nativitatis Romana archiva custodiunt’ (Adv.  Marc. iv. 7).

[110:1] Beitraege, i. p. 261 sqq.

[110:2] Evangelien Justin’s u.s.w., p. 270 sqq.

[110:3] The chief authority is Eus. H.  E. vi. 12.

[110:4] Cf.  Hilgenfeld, Ev.  Justin’s, p. 157.

[116:1] A somewhat similar classification has been made by De Wette, Einleitung in das N. T., pp. 104-110, in which however the standard seems to be somewhat lower than that which I have assumed; several instances of variation which I had classed as decided, De Wette considers to be only slight.  I hope I may consider this a proof that the classification above given has not been influenced by bias.

[119:1] Beitraege, i. p. 237.

[119:2] S.R. i. p. 396 sqq.

[120:1] Die drei ersten Evangelien, Goettingen, 1850. [A second, revised, edition of this work has recently appeared.]

[120:2] Die Synoptischen Evangelien, Leipzig, 1863, p. 88.

[120:3] Das Marcus-evangelium, Berlin, 1872, p. 299.

[120:4] Beitraege, i. p. 219.

[120:5] Dr. Westcott well calls this ’the prophetic sense of the present’ (On the Canon, p. 128).

[122:1] ‘This is meaningless,’ writes Mr. Baring-Gould of the canonical text, rather hastily, and forgetting, as it would appear, the concluding cause (Lost and Hostile Gospels, p. 166); cp. S.R. i. p. 354, ii. p. 28.

[123:1] i. pp. 196, 227, 258.

[123:2] Geschichte des Neutestamentlichen Kanon (ed.  Volkmar, Berlin, 1860), p. 16.

[124:1] Adv.  Haer. 428 D.

[124:2] I am not quite clear that more is meant (as Meyer, Ellicott Huls.  Lect. p. 339, n. 2, and others maintain) in the evangelical language than that the drops of sweat ’resembled blood;’ [Greek:  hosei] seems to qualify [Greek:  haimatos] as much as [Greek:  thromboi].  Compare especially the interesting parallels from medical writers quoted by McClellan ad loc.