have some eye to good repute as well as to other matters.  So Titus said to somebody whose society he had previously affected:  “It is not the same thing to desire something from another as to decide a case yourself, nor to ask something from another as it is to give it to some one yourself.”) Perhaps his satisfactory conduct was also due to his surviving so short a time compared with most rulers, for he was thus given little opportunity for wrongdoing.  For he lived after this only two years, two months and twenty days in addition to his thirty-nine years, five months and twenty-five days.  People compare this feature of Titus’s career with the fullness of years of Augustus, and say that the latter would never have won affection if he had lived a shorter time, nor the former, if he had lived longer.  Augustus, though at the outset he had shown himself rather harsh because of the wars and the political factions, was able later in the course of time to become distinguished for his kindnesses:  Titus ruled with forbearance and died at the summit of his glory, whereas if he had enjoyed a longer life, it might have been proved that he owes his present fame more to good fortune than to virtue.

[Sidenote:—­19—­] It is worth noting that Titus during his reign put no senator to death, nor was any one else slain by him all the time that he was emperor.  Cases involving maiestas he would never entertain himself nor allow others to entertain, for he said:  “It is impossible for me to be insulted or outraged in any way.  I do naught that deserves censure and I care not for what is falsely reported.  As for the emperors that are dead and gone, they will avenge themselves in case any one does them wrong, if in very truth they be heroes and possess some power.”—­He also made various arrangements to render men more secure and free from trouble.  One of these was the posting of a notice confirming all gifts bestowed upon any person by the former emperors.  This also enabled him to avoid the nuisance of having people petition him individually about the matter.—­Informers he banished from the city.

In money matters he was frugal and sanctioned no unnecessary expenditure, yet he did not punish any one for opposite tendencies.

In his reign also the False Nero appeared, who was an Asiatic and called himself Terentius Maximus.  He resembled Nero in form and voice:  he even sang to the zither’s accompaniment.  He gained a few followers in Asia and in his onward progress to the Euphrates he secured a far greater number and at length sought a retreat with Artabanus, the Parthian chief, who, out of the anger that he felt toward Titus, both received the pretender and set about preparations for restoring him to Rome. (Compare John of Antioch, frag. 104 Mueller).