hearts were overflowing, and they repeated over and over again the same accusations, to which he had already replied so many times:  ’That he cured the sick, and cast out devils, by the help of devils—­that he profaned the Sabbath—­incited the people to rebel—­called the Pharisees a race of vipers and adulterers—­predicted the destruction of Jerusalem—­frequented the society of publicans and sinners—­assembled the people and gave himself out as a king, a prophet, and the Son of God.’  They deposed ’that he was constantly speaking of his kingdom,—­that he forbade divorce,—­called himself the Bread of Life, and said that whoever did not eat his flesh and drink his blood would not have eternal life.’

Thus did they distort and misinterpret the words he had uttered, the instructions he had given and the parables by which he had illustrated his instructions, giving them the semblance of crimes.  But these witnesses could not agree in their depositions, for one said, ’He calls himself king;’ and a second instantly contradicted, saying, ’No, he allows persons to call him so; but directly they attempted to proclaim him, he fled.’  Another said, ‘He calls himself the Son of God,’ but he was interrupted by a fourth, who exclaimed, ’No, he only styles himself the Son of God because he does the will of his Heavenly Father.’  Some of the witnesses stated that he had cured them, but that their diseases had returned, and that his pretended cures were only performed by magic.  They spoke likewise of the cure of the paralytic man at the pool of Bethsaida, but they distorted the facts so as to give them the semblance of crimes, and even in these accusations they could not agree, contradicting one another.  The Pharisees of Sephoris, with whom he had once had a discussion on the subject of divorces, accused him of teaching false doctrines, and a young man of Nazareth, whom he had refused to allow to become one of his disciples, was likewise base enough to bear witness against him.

It was found to be utterly impossible to prove a single fact, and the witnesses appeared to come forward for the sole purpose of insulting Jesus, rather than to demonstrate the truth of their statements.  Whilst they were disputing with one another, Caiphas and some of the other members of the Council employed themselves in questioning Jesus, and turning his answers into derision.  ’What species of king art thou?  Give proofs of thy power!  Call the legions of angels of whom thou didst speak in the Garden of Olives!  What hast thou done with the money given unto thee by the widows, and other simpletons whom thou didst seduce by thy false doctrines?  Answer at once:  speak out,—­art thou dumb?  Thou wouldst have been far wiser to have kept silence when in the midst of the foolish mob:  there thou didst speak far too much.’