with which they are vested.  Yet the discretion must exist somewhere.  The Constitution has given it to the representatives of all the people, checked by the representatives of the States and by the Executive power.  The South Carolina construction gives it to the legislature or the convention of a single State, where neither the people of the different States, nor the States in their separate capacity, nor the Chief Magistrate elected by the people have any representation.  Which is the most discreet disposition of the power?  I do not ask you, fellow-citizens, which is the constitutional disposition; that instrument speaks a language not to be misunderstood.  But if you were assembled in general convention, which would you think the safest depository of this discretionary power in the last resort?  Would you add a clause giving it to each of the States, or would you sanction the wise provisions already made by your Constitution?  If this should be the result of your deliberations when providing for the future, are you, can you, be ready to risk all that we hold dear, to establish, for a temporary and a local purpose, that which you must acknowledge to be destructive, and even absurd, as a general provision?  Carry out the consequences of this right vested in the different States, and you must perceive that the crisis your conduct presents at this day would recur whenever any law of the United States displeased any of the States, and that we should soon cease to be a nation.

The ordinance, with the same knowledge of the future that characterizes a former objection, tells you that the proceeds of the tax will be unconstitutionally applied.  If this could be ascertained with certainty, the objection would with more propriety be reserved for the law so applying the proceeds, but surely can not be urged against the laws levying the duty.

These are the allegations contained in the ordinance.  Examine them seriously, my fellow-citizens; judge for yourselves.  I appeal to you to determine whether they are so clear, so convincing, as to leave no doubt of their correctness; and even if you should come to this conclusion, how far they justify the reckless, destructive course which you are directed to pursue.  Review these objections and the conclusions drawn from them once more.  What are they?  Every law, then, for raising revenue, according to the South Carolina ordinance, may be rightfully annulled, unless it be so framed as no law ever will or can be framed.  Congress have a right to pass laws for raising revenue and each State have a right to oppose their execution—­two rights directly opposed to each other; and yet is this absurdity supposed to be contained in an instrument drawn for the express purpose of avoiding collisions between the States and the General Government by an assembly of the most enlightened statesmen and purest patriots ever embodied for a similar purpose.