Ib. p. 39.

“Even repentance and faith,” (says Dr. Hawker,) “those most essential qualifications of the mind, for the participation and enjoyment of the blessings of the Gospel, (and which all real disciples of the Lord Jesus cannot but possess,) are ’never supposed as a condition which the sinner performs to entitle him to mercy’, but merely as evidences that he is brought and has obtained mercy.  ’They cannot be the conditions’ of obtaining salvation.”

Ought not this single quotation to have satisfied the Barrister, that no practical difference is deducible from these doctrines?  “Essential qualifications,” says the Methodist:—­“terms and conditions,” says the spiritual higgler.  But if a man begins to reflect on his past life, is he to withstand the inclination?  God forbid! exclaim both.  If he feels a commencing shame and sorrow, is he to check the feeling?  God forbid! cry both in one breath!  But should not remembrancers be thrown in the way of sinners, and the voice of warning sound through every street and every wilderness?  Doubtless, quoth the Rationalist.  We do it, we do it, shout the Methodists.  In every corner of every lane, in the high road, and in the waste, we send forth the voice—­Come to Christ, and repent, and be cleansed!  Aye, quoth the Rationalist, but I say Repent, and become clean, and go to Christ—­Now is not Mr. Rationalist as great a bigot as the Methodists, as he is, ‘me judice’, a worse psychologist?

Part II. p. 40.

The former authorities on this subject I had quoted from the Gospel according to St. Luke:  that Gospel most positively and most solemnly declares the ‘repentance’ of sinners to be the ‘condition’ on which ‘alone’ salvation can be obtained.  But the doctors of the new divinity ‘deny’ this:  they tell us distinctly ‘it cannot’ be.  For the future, the Gospel according to Calvin must be received as the truth.  Sinners will certainly prefer it as the more comfortable of the two beyond all comparison.

Mercy! but only to read Calvin’s account of that repentance, without which there is no sign of election, and to call it “the more comfortable of the two?” The very term by which the German New-Birthites express it is enough to give one goose-flesh—­’das Herzknirschen’—­the very heart crashed between the teeth of a lock-jaw’d agony!

Ib.

  What is ‘faith’?  Is it not a conviction produced in the mind by
  adequate testimony?

No! that is not the meaning of faith in the Gospel, nor indeed anywhere else.  Were it so, the stronger the testimony, the more adequate the faith.  Yet who says, I have faith in the existence of George II., as his present Majesty’s antecessor and grandfather?—­If testimony, then evidence too;—­and who has faith that the two sides of all triangles are greater than the third?  In truth, faith, even in common language, always implies some effort, something of