&c. But this error of his, Innocentius Jentilettus,
a French lawyer, theorem. 9. comment. 1. de Relig,
and Thomas Bozius in his book de ruinis gentium
et Regnorum have copiously confuted. Many
politicians, I dare not deny, maintain religion as
a true means, and sincerely speak of it without hypocrisy,
are truly zealous and religious themselves. Justice
and religion are the two chief props and supporters
of a well-governed commonwealth: but most of
them are but Machiavellians, counterfeits only for
political ends; for solus rex (which Campanella,
cap. 18. atheismi triumphali observes), as amongst
our modern Turks, reipub. Finis, as knowing
[6391]_magnus ejus in animos imperium_; and that,
as [6392]Sabellicus delivers, “A man without
religion, is like a horse without a bridle.”
No way better to curb than superstition, to terrify
men’s consciences, and to keep them in awe:
they make new laws, statutes, invent new religions,
ceremonies, as so many stalking horses, to their ends.
[6393]_Haec enim (religio) si falsa sit, dummodo vera
credatur, animorum ferociam domat, libidines coercet,
subditos principi obsequentes efficit._ [6394]Therefore
(saith [6395]Polybius of Lycurgus), “did he
maintain ceremonies, not that he was superstitious
himself, but that he had perceived mortal men more
apt to embrace paradoxes than aught else, and durst
attempt no evil things for fear of the gods.”
This was Zamolcus’s stratagem amongst the Thracians,
Numa’s plot, when he said he had conference
with the nymph Aegeria, and that of Sertorius with
a hart; to get more credit to their decrees, by deriving
them from the gods; or else they did all by divine
instinct, which Nicholas Damascen well observes of
Lycurgus, Solon, and Minos, they had their laws dictated,
monte sacro, by Jupiter himself. So Mahomet
referred his new laws to the [6396]angel Gabriel,
by whose direction he gave out they were made.
Caligula in Dion feigned himself to be familiar with
Castor and Pollux, and many such, which kept those
Romans under (who, as Machiavel proves, lib. 1.
disput. cap. 11. et 12. were Religione maxime
moti, most superstitious): and did curb the
people more by this means, than by force of arms, or
severity of human laws. Sola plebecula eam agnoscebat
(saith Vaninus, dial. 1. lib. 4. de admirandis
naturae arcanis) speaking of religion, que facile
decipitur, magnates vero et philosophi nequaquam,
your grandees and philosophers had no such conceit,
sed ad imperii conformationem et amplificationem
quam sine praetextu religionis tueri non poterant;
and many thousands in all ages have ever held as much,
Philosophers especially, animadvertebant hi semper
haec esse fabellas, attamen ob metum publicae potestatis
silere cogebantur they were still silent for fear
of laws, &c. To this end that Syrian Phyresides,
Pythagoras his master, broached in the East amongst
the heathens, first the immortality of the soul, as