he vilified by [127] Caligula, Agellius, Fabius, and Lipsius himself, his chief propugner? In eo pleraque pernitiosa, saith the same Fabius, many childish tracts and sentences he hath, sermo illaboratus, too negligent often and remiss, as Agellius observes, oratio vulgaris et protrita, dicaces et ineptae, sententiae, eruditio plebeia, an homely shallow writer as he is. In partibus spinas et fastidia habet, saith [128]Lipsius; and, as in all his other works, so especially in his epistles, aliae in argutiis et ineptiis occupantur, intricatus alicubi, et parum compositus, sine copia rerum hoc fecit, he jumbles up many things together immethodically, after the Stoics’ fashion, parum ordinavit, multa accumulavit, &c.  If Seneca be thus lashed, and many famous men that I could name, what shall I expect?  How shall I that am vix umbra tanti philosophi hope to please?  “No man so absolute” ([129]Erasmus holds) “to satisfy all, except antiquity, prescription, &c., set a bar.”  But as I have proved in Seneca, this will not always take place, how shall I evade?  ’Tis the common doom of all writers, I must (I say) abide it; I seek not applause; [130]_Non ego ventosa venor suffragia plebis_; again, non sum adeo informis, I would not be [131]vilified: 

[132]   ------“laudatus abunde,
Non fastiditus si tibi, lector, ero.”

I fear good men’s censures, and to their favourable acceptance I submit my labours,

[133]   ------“et linguas mancipiorum
Contemno.”------

As the barking of a dog, I securely contemn those malicious and scurrile obloquies, flouts, calumnies of railers and detractors; I scorn the rest.  What therefore I have said, pro tenuitate mea, I have said.

One or two things yet I was desirous to have amended if I could, concerning the manner of handling this my subject, for which I must apologise, deprecari, and upon better advice give the friendly reader notice:  it was not mine intent to prostitute my muse in English, or to divulge secreta Minervae, but to have exposed this more contract in Latin, if I could have got it printed.  Any scurrile pamphlet is welcome to our mercenary stationers in English; they print all

------“cuduntque libellos
In quorum foliis vix simia nuda cacaret;”

But in Latin they will not deal; which is one of the reasons [134]Nicholas Car, in his oration of the paucity of English writers, gives, that so many flourishing wits are smothered in oblivion, lie dead and buried in this our nation.  Another main fault is, that I have not revised the copy, and amended the style, which now flows remissly, as it was first conceived; but my leisure would not permit; Feci nec quod potui, nec quod volui, I confess it is neither as I would, nor as it should be.

[135] “Cum relego scripsisse pudet, quia plurima cerno
        Me quoque quae fuerant judice digna lini.”