he walked in the procession to the proclamation of George II.  And no doubt he was one of very few personages in England whose eyes Were moistened for that event.  Nevertheless, there was something of bonhommie in the character of George I. that one misses in his successor.  His love of punch, and his habit of becoming a little tipsy over his private dinners with Sir Robert Walpole, were English as well as German traits, and were regarded almost as condescensions; and then he had a kind of slow wit, that was turned upon the venial officials whose perquisites were at their disgraceful height in his time.

‘A strange country this,’ said the monarch, in his most clamorous German:  ’one day, after I came to St. James’s, I looked out of the window, and saw a park, with walks, laurels, &c.; these they told me were mine.  The next day Lord Chetwynd, the ranger of my park, sends me a brace of carp out of my canal; I was told, thereupon, that I must give five guineas to Lord Chetwynd’s porter for bringing me my own fish, out of my own canal, in my own park!’ In spite of some agreeable qualities, George I. was, however, anything but a ‘good sort of man.’  It is difficult how to rank the two first Georges; both were detestable as men, and scarcely tolerable as monarchs.  The foreign deeds of George I. were stained with the supposed murder of Count Konigsmark:  the English career of George II. was one of the coarsest profligacy.  Their example was infamous.

His father’s only sister having become the second wife of Charles Lord Townshend, Horace was educated with his cousins; and the tutor selected was Edward Weston, the son of Stephen, Bishop of Exeter; this preceptor was afterwards engaged in a controversy with Dr. Warburton, concerning the ‘Naturalization of the Jews.’  By that learned, haughty disputant, he is termed ‘a gazetteer by profession—­by inclination a Methodist.’  Such was the man who guided the dawning intellect of Horace Walpole.  Under his care he remained until he went, in 1727, to Eton.  But Walpole’s was not merely a scholastic education:  he was destined for the law—­and, on going up to Cambridge, was obliged to attend lectures on civil law.  He went from Eton to King’s College—­where he was, however, more disposed to what are termed accomplishments than to deep reading.  At Cambridge he even studied Italian; at home he learned to dance and fence; and took lessons in drawing from Bernard Lens, drawing-master to the Duke of Cumberland and his sisters.  It is not to be wondered at that he left Cambridge without taking a degree.

But fortune was lying, as it were, in wait for him; and various sinecures had been reserved for the Minister’s youngest son:  first, he became Inspector of the Imports and Exports in the Customs; but soon resigned that post to be Usher of the Exchequer.  ‘And as soon,’ he writes, ’as I became of age I took possession of two other little patent places in the Exchequer, called Comptroller of the Pipe, and Clerk of the Estreats.  They had been held for me by Mr. Fane.’