“That would be too severe a misfortune for others,” says my complimentary ape.  “You approve, perhaps, of Rosemary’s ’Babes in the Wood,’ as something fresh and naive in sculpture?”

“I think it enchanting.”

“Does he know that?  Or will you permit me to tell him?”

“Heaven forbid!  It would be an impertinence in me to praise a work of his—­to pronounce on its quality; and that I happen to like it can be of no consequence to him.”

Here was an occasion for Hinze to smile down on his hat and stroke it—­Felicia’s ignorance that her praise was inestimable being peculiarly noteworthy to an observer of mankind.  Presently he was quite sure that her favourite author was Shakspere, and wished to know what she thought of Hamlet’s madness.  When she had quoted Wilhelm Meister on this point, and had afterwards testified that “Lear” was beyond adequate presentation, that “Julius Caesar” was an effective acting play, and that a poet may know a good deal about human nature while knowing little of geography, Hinze appeared so impressed with the plenitude of these revelations that he recapitulated them, weaving them together with threads of compliment—­“As you very justly observed;” and—­“It is most true, as you say;” and—­“It were well if others noted what you have remarked.”

Some listeners incautious in their epithets would have called Hinze an “ass.”  For my part I would never insult that intelligent and unpretending animal who no doubt brays with perfect simplicity and substantial meaning to those acquainted with his idiom, and if he feigns more submission than he feels, has weighty reasons for doing so—­I would never, I say, insult that historic and ill-appreciated animal, the ass, by giving his name to a man whose continuous pretence is so shallow in its motive, so unexcused by any sharp appetite as this of Hinze’s.

But perhaps you would say that his adulatory manner was originally adopted under strong promptings of self-interest, and that his absurdly over-acted deference to persons from whom he expects no patronage is the unreflecting persistence of habit—­just as those who live with the deaf will shout to everybody else.

And you might indeed imagine that in talking to Tulpian, who has considerable interest at his disposal, Hinze had a desired appointment in his mind.  Tulpian is appealed to on innumerable subjects, and if he is unwilling to express himself on any one of them, says so with instructive copiousness:  he is much listened to, and his utterances are registered and reported with more or less exactitude.  But I think he has no other listener who comports himself as Hinze does—­who, figuratively speaking, carries about a small spoon ready to pick up any dusty crumb of opinion that the eloquent man may have let drop.  Tulpian, with reverence be it said, has some rather absurd notions, such as a mind of large discourse often finds room for:  they slip about among his