dark night in Sir Thomas Lucy’s[23] preserves, the world would have wagged on better or worse, the pitcher gone to the well, the scythe to the corn, and the student to his book; and no one been any the wiser of the loss.  There are not many works extant, if you look the alternative all over, which are worth the price of a pound of tobacco to a man of limited means.  This is a sobering reflection for the proudest of our earthly vanities.  Even a tobacconist may, upon consideration, find no great cause for personal vainglory in the phrase; for although tobacco is an admirable sedative, the qualities necessary for retailing it are neither rare nor precious in themselves.  Alas and alas! you may take it how you will, but the services of no single individual are indispensable.  Atlas[24] was just a gentleman with a protracted nightmare!  And yet you see merchants who go and labour themselves into a great fortune and thence into bankruptcy court; scribblers who keep scribbling at little articles until their temper is a cross to all who come about them, as though Pharaoh should set the Israelites to make a pin instead of a pyramid;[25] and fine young men who work themselves into a decline,[26] and are driven off in a hearse with white plumes upon it.  Would you not suppose these persons had been whispered, by the Master of the Ceremonies, the promise of some momentous destiny? and that this lukewarm bullet on which they play their farces was the bull’s-eye and centrepoint of all the universe?  And yet it is not so.  The ends for which they give away their priceless youth, for all they know, may be chimerical or hurtful; the glory and riches they expect may never come, or may find them indifferent; and they and the world they inhabit are so inconsiderable that the mind freezes at the thought.

NOTES

This essay was first printed in the Cornhill Magazine, for July 1877, Vol.  XXXVI, pp. 80-86.  It was next published in the volume, Virginibus Puerisque, in 1881.  Although this book contains some of the most admirable specimens of Stevenson’s style, it did not have a large sale, and it was not until 1887 that another edition Appeared.  The editor of the Cornhill Magazine from 1871 to 1882 was Leslie Stephen (1832-1904), whose kindness and encouragement to the new writer were of the utmost importance at this critical time.  That so grave and serious a critic as Leslie Stephen should have taken such delight in a jeu d’esprit like Idlers, is proof, if any were needed, for the breadth of his literary outlook.  Stevenson had been at work on this article a year before its appearance, which shows that his Apology for Idlers demanded from him anything but idling.  As Graham Balfour says, in his Life of Stevenson, I, 122, “Except before his own conscience, there was hardly any time when the author of the Apology for Idlers ever really neglected the tasks of his true vocation.”