Of all earth’s meteors, here at least is the most strange and consoling:  that this ennobled lemur, this hair-crowned bubble of the dust, this inheritor of a few years and sorrows, should yet deny himself his rare delights, and add to his frequent pains, and live for an ideal, however misconceived.  Nor can we stop with man.  A new doctrine,[10] received with screams a little while ago by canting moralists, and still not properly worked into the body of our thoughts, lights us a step farther into the heart of this rough but noble universe.  For nowadays the pride of man denies in vain his kinship with the original dust.  He stands no longer like a thing apart.  Close at his heels we see the dog, prince of another genius:  and in him too, we see dumbly testified the same cultus[11] of an unattainable ideal, the same constancy in failure.  Does it stop with the dog?  We look at our feet where the ground is blackened with the swarming ant:  a creature so small, so far from us in the hierarchy of brutes, that we can scarce trace and scarce comprehend his doings; and here also, in his ordered polities and rigorous justice, we see confessed the law of duty and the fact of individual sin.  Does it stop, then, with the ant?  Rather this desire of well-doing and this doom of frailty run through all the grades of life:  rather is this earth, from the frosty top of Everest[12] to the next margin of the internal fire, one stage of ineffectual virtues and one temple of pious tears and perseverance.  The whole creation groaneth[13] and travaileth together.  It is the common and the god-like law of life.  The browsers, the biters, the barkers, the hairy coats of field and forest, the squirrel in the oak, the thousand-footed creeper in the dust, as they share with us the gift of life, share with us the love of an ideal:  strive like us—­like us are tempted to grow weary of the struggle—­to do well; like us receive at times unmerited refreshment, visitings of support, returns of courage; and are condemned like us to be crucified between that double law[14] of the members and the will.  Are they like us, I wonder in the timid hope of some reward, some sugar with the drug? do they, too, stand aghast at unrewarded virtues, at the sufferings of those whom, in our partiality, we take to be just, and the prosperity of such as, in our blindness, we call wicked?  It may be, and yet God knows what they should look for.  Even while they look, even while they repent, the foot of man treads them by thousands in the dust, the yelping hounds burst upon their trail, the bullet speeds, the knives are heating in the den of the vivisectionist;[15] or the dew falls, and the generation of a day is blotted out.  For these are creatures, compared with whom our weakness is strength, our ignorance wisdom, our brief span eternity.

And as we dwell, we living things, in our isle of terror[16] and under the imminent hand of death, God forbid it should be man the erected, the reasoner, the wise in his own eyes—­God forbid it should be man that wearies in well-doing,[17] that despairs of unrewarded effort, or utters the language of complaint.  Let it be enough for faith, that the whole creation groans in mortal frailty, strives with unconquerable constancy:  Surely not all in vain.[18]