Division of the subject.

Aristotle[1] divides the blessings of life into three classes—­those which come to us from without, those of the soul, and those of the body.  Keeping nothing of this division but the number, I observe that the fundamental differences in human lot may be reduced to three distinct classes: 

[Footnote 1:  Eth.  Nichom., I. 8.]

(1) What a man is:  that is to say, personality, in the widest sense of the word; under which are included health, strength, beauty, temperament, moral character, intelligence, and education.

(2) What a man has:  that is, property and possessions of every kind.

(3) How a man stands in the estimation of others:  by which is to be understood, as everybody knows, what a man is in the eyes of his fellowmen, or, more strictly, the light in which they regard him.  This is shown by their opinion of him; and their opinion is in its turn manifested by the honor in which he is held, and by his rank and reputation.

The differences which come under the first head are those which Nature herself has set between man and man; and from this fact alone we may at once infer that they influence the happiness or unhappiness of mankind in a much more vital and radical way than those contained under the two following heads, which are merely the effect of human arrangements.  Compared with genuine personal advantages, such as a great mind or a great heart, all the privileges of rank or birth, even of royal birth, are but as kings on the stage, to kings in real life.  The same thing was said long ago by Metrodorus, the earliest disciple of Epicurus, who wrote as the title of one of his chapters, The happiness we receive from ourselves is greater than that which we obtain from our surroundings[1] And it is an obvious fact, which cannot be called in question, that the principal element in a man’s well-being,—­indeed, in the whole tenor of his existence,—­is what he is made of, his inner constitution.  For this is the immediate source of that inward satisfaction or dissatisfaction resulting from the sum total of his sensations, desires and thoughts; whilst his surroundings, on the other hand, exert only a mediate or indirect influence upon him.  This is why the same external events or circumstances affect no two people alike; even with perfectly similar surroundings every one lives in a world of his own.  For a man has immediate apprehension only of his own ideas, feelings and volitions; the outer world can influence him only in so far as it brings these to life.  The world in which a man lives shapes itself chiefly by the way in which he looks at it, and so it proves different to different men; to one it is barren, dull, and superficial; to another rich, interesting, and full of meaning.  On hearing of the interesting events which have happened in the course of a man’s experience, many people will wish that similar things had happened in their