to arms except for purposes of self-defence. Instead
of trying to excuse themselves by telling public and
official lies, which are almost more revolting than
war itself, they should take their stand, as bold
as brass, on Macchiavelli’s doctrine. The
gist of it may be stated to be this: that whereas
between one individual and another, and so far as
concerns the law and morality of their relations,
the principle,
Don’t do to others what you
wouldn’t like done to yourself, certainly
applies, it is the converse of this principle which
is appropriate in the case of nations and in politics:
What you wouldn’t like done to yourself do
to others. If you do not want to be put under
a foreign yoke, take time by the forelock, and put
your neighbour under it himself; whenever, that is
to say, his weakness offers you the opportunity.
For if you let the opportunity pass, it will desert
one day to the enemy’s camp and offer itself
there. Then your enemy will put you under his
yoke; and your failure to grasp the opportunity may
be paid for, not by the generation which was guilty
of it, but by the next. This Macchiavellian principle
is always a much more decent cloak for the lust of
robbery than the rags of very obvious lies in a speech
from the head of the State; lies, too, of a description
which recalls the well-known story of the rabbit attacking
the dog. Every State looks upon its neighbours
as at bottom a horde of robbers, who will fall upon
it as soon as they have the opportunity.
* * * *
*
Between the serf, the farmer, the tenant, and the
mortgagee, the difference is rather one of form than
of substance. Whether the peasant belongs to
me, or the land on which he has to get a living; whether
the bird is mine, or its food, the tree or its fruit,
is a matter of little moment; for, as Shakespeare
makes Shylock say:
You
take my life
When you do take the means whereby I live.
The free peasant has, indeed, the advantage that he
can go off and seek his fortune in the wide world;
whereas the serf who is attached to the soil, glebae
adscriptus, has an advantage which is perhaps
still greater, that when failure of crops or illness,
old age or incapacity, render him helpless, his master
must look after him, and so he sleeps well at night;
whereas, if the crops fail, his master tosses about
on his bed trying to think how he is to procure bread
for his men. As long ago as Menander it was said
that it is better to be the slave of a good master
than to live miserably as a freeman. Another
advantage possessed by the free is that if they have
any talents they can improve their position; but the
same advantage is not wholly withheld from the slave.
If he proves himself useful to his master by the exercise
of any skill, he is treated accordingly; just as in
ancient Rome mechanics, foremen of workshops, architects,
nay, even doctors, were generally slaves.