not result in the starvation of the Bolsheviki; it would simply mean the death of our friends.  The cordon policy is a policy which, as humane people, those present could not consider.

Mr. Lloyd George asked who was there to overthrow the Bolsheviki?  He had been told there were three men, Denekin, Kolchak and Knox.  In considering the chances of these people to overthrow the Bolsheviki, he pointed out that he had received information that the Czecho-Slovaks now refused to fight; that the Russian Army was not to be trusted, and that while it was true that a Bolshevik Army had recently gone over to Kolchak it was never certain that just the reverse of this would not take place.  If the Allies counted on any of these men, he believed they were building on quick-sand.  He had heard a lot of talk about Denekin, but when he looked on the map he found that Denekin was occupying a little backyard near the Black Sea.  Then he had been told that Denekin had recognized Kolchak, but when he looked on the map, there was a great solid block of territory between Denekin and Kolchak.  Moreover, from information received it would appear that Kolchak had been collecting members of the old regime around him, and would seem to be at heart a monarchist.  It appeared that the Czecho-Slovaks were finding this out.  The sympathies of the Czecho-Slovaks are very democratic, and they are not at all prepared to fight for the restoration of the old conditions in Russia.

     Mr. Lloyd George stated that he was informed that at the
     present time two-thirds of Bolshevik Russia was starving.

     Institutions of Bolsheviki are institutions of old Czarist
     regime.  This is not what one would call creating a new
     world.

3.  The third alternative was contained in the British proposal, which was to summon these people to Paris to appear before those present, somewhat in the way that the Roman Empire summoned chiefs of outlying tributary states to render an account of their actions.

Mr. Lloyd George pointed out the fact that the argument might be used that there were already here certain representatives of these Governments; but take, for instance, the case of Sazonov, who claims to represent the Government of Omsk.  As a matter of fact, Sazonov can not speak from personal observation.  He is nothing but a partisan, like all the rest.  He has never been in contact, and is not now in direct contact with the Government at Omsk.

It would be manifestly absurd for those who are responsible for bringing about the Peace Conference, to come to any agreement and leave Paris when one-half of Europe and one-half of Asia is still in flames.  Those present must settle this question or make fools of themselves.