and a little judgment, while that care and judgment is so slight as to supply no real food for thought, or education for the judgment.  No doubt a good deal of the less responsible work connected with machinery is of this order.  Moreover, there are certain other influences to be taken into account which affect the net resuit of the growth of machinery upon the condition of the workers.  The physical and moral evils connected with the close confinement of large bodies of workers, especially in the case of young persons, within the narrow unwholesome limits of the factory or mill, though considerably mitigated by the operation of factory legislation, are still no light offset against the advantages which have been mentioned.  The weakly, ill-formed bodies, the unhealthy lives lived by the factory-workers in our great manufacturing centres are facts which have an intimate connection with the growth of machinery.  But though our agricultural population, in spite of their poverty and hard work, live longer and enjoy better physical health than our town-workers, there are few who would deny that the town-workers are both better educated and more intelligent.  This intelligence must in a large measure be attributed to the influences of machinery, and of those social conditions which machinery has assisted to establish.  This intelligence must be reckoned as an adequate offset against the formal specialization of machine-labour, and must be regarded as an emancipative influence, giving to its possessor a larger choice in the forms of employment.  So far as a man’s labour-power consists in the mere knowledge how to tend a particular piece of machinery he may appear to be more “enslaved” with each specialization of machinery; but so far as his labour-power consists in the practice of discretion and intelligence, these are qualities which render him more free.

Moreover, as regards the specialization of machinery, there is one point to be noticed which modifies to some considerable extent the effects of subdivision upon labour.  On the one hand, the tendency to split up the manufacture of a commodity into several distinct branches, often undertaken in different localities and with wholly different machinery, prevents the skilled worker in one branch from passing into another, and thus limits his practical freedom as an industrial worker.  On the other hand, this has its compensating advantage in the tendency of different trades to adopt analogous kinds of machinery and similar processes.  Thus, while a machinist engaged in a screw manufactory is so specialized that he cannot easily pass from one process to another process in the screw trade, he will find himself able to obtain employment in other hardware manufactures which employ the same or similar processes.