advantages of large capital over small are able to
assert themselves more and more effectively.
In certain branches of trade, which have not yet been
taken over by elaborate machinery, or where everything
depends upon the personal activity and intelligence,
and the detailed supervision of a fully interested
owner, the small capitalist may still hold his own,
as in certain branches of retail trade. But the
general movement is in favour of large businesses.
Everywhere the big business is swallowing up the smaller,
and in its turn is liable to be swallowed by a bigger
one. In manufacture, where the cosmopolitan character
is strongest, and where machinery plays so large a
part, the movement towards vast businesses is most
marked; each year makes it more rapid, and more general.
But in wholesale and retail distribution, though somewhat
slower, the tendency is the same. Even in agriculture,
where close personal care and the limitations of a
local market temper the larger tendency, the recent
annals of Western America and Australia supply startling
evidence of the concentrative force of machinery.
The meaning of this movement in capital must not be
mistaken. It is not merely that among competing
businesses, the larger showing themselves the stronger
survive, and the smaller, out-competed disappear.
This of course often happens. The big screw-manufacturer
able to provide some new labour-saving machinery,
to advertise more effectively, or even to sell at
a loss for a period of time, can drown his weaker competitors
and take their trade. The small tradesman can
no longer hold his own in the fight with the universal
provider, or the co-operative store.
But this destruction of the small business, though
an essential factor in the movement, is not perhaps
the most important aspect. The industrial superiority
of the large business over the small makes for the
concentration both of small capitals and of business
ability. The monster millionaire, who owns the
whole or the bulk of his great business, is after
all a very rare specimen. The typical business
form of to-day is the joint stock company. This
simply means that a number of capitalists, who might
otherwise have been competing with one another on
a small scale of business, recognizing the advantage
of size, agree to mass their capital into one large
lump, and to entrust its manipulation to the best
business ability they can muster among them, or procure
from outside. This process in its simplest form
is seen in the amalgamation of existing and competing
businesses, notable examples of which have recently
occurred in the London publishing trade. But the
ordinary Company, whether it grows by the expansion
of some large existent business, or, like most railways
or other new enterprises, is formed out of money subscribed
in order to form a business, represents the same concentrating
tendency. These share-owners put their capital
together into one concern, in order to reap some advantage